#7 ban reason more complete

I was using no!spam with succes combining 2 linked
bots, one with @ the other without, and it was rather
successfull.
My question was probably already considered, but i
would like to ask it anyway.
What i would like to have is different kickban reasons
for different kind of spam...
Let's say user A messages the bot and asks him to join
#x, so the kick message would be "no inviting", and if
the spam matches http or www, it would have to be "no
advertizing", and so on.
Unfortunatelly TCL is not of the programming languages
i easilly understand and can code, so i have no clues
about the exact implementation of this idea.
All the best,
m.m.

[Philip Richardson]

Logged In: YES
user_id=113655

I appologies for the late reply to this request.

I have receintly discused with some1 else, the potential
problems with this sort of feature.

If would rrequire a major re-write of no!spam, to cater for
added information, with the downside of not being able to
downgrade once installed.

It would work by adding a default message for a certain
type of spam (IE, "You sent a spam message" for the
channel spam type). On top of this, once you have added a
spam string tot he bot, you would be able to append a
message for it. If a message is present, it would be used, if
not, the default would be used.

While this is not the direction I would want no!spam to go in
(bloat, to a allready feature rich, slow (due to the nature of
spam-detection) script). I have no choice in reality, but to
offer a comprimise to user sugestions.

To this, I would doubtfully support random spam kcik
messages, as the default.

I have not had chance to look at the code for some time,
due to lack of computing equipment on my part. I hope to
remidy this situation, within the next month.

Once this is done, I will look into this matter more, and look
into what options available to add this.