Menu
▾
▴
nmock-general
|
From: John P. <Joh...@de...> - 2005-05-09 14:40:16
|
Hi everyone, =20 I just joined the list after I got an email response from Joe Walnes telling me he's no longer involved in the NMock project. So the first thing I wanted to suggest is an update to the nmock.org website with some more up-to-date contact info. My apologies if any of this has been recently addressed, but a quick look through the archives didn't reveal anything. =20 More generally, it's not really clear where the "official" source for information on NMock is. Clicking on the "Tracker" link on NMock.org takes you to one bug tracking system, while another set of issues are tracked on SourceForge. In general, the only reference the NMock.org page makes to SourceForge is for downloading source or binaries. =20 Anyway, the reason I emailed Joe in the first place was that I ran into bug "NMO-44" as tracked by the JIRA bug tracker ("Using DynamicMock with inheriting interfaces throws NullReferenceException") and think that I've got a fix for it (and a unit test to check for it). How can I go about submitting my change back to the project for review? =20 Thanks, John. |
|
From: Steve F. <st...@m3...> - 2005-05-10 22:21:17
|
It's true that things have been very quiet for a while. At present, Nat=20= is cooking up a very nice-looking rewrite based on our experiences with=20= jMock (www.jmock.org). I don't have a .Net box at the moment, anyone=20 else want to volunteer to pick this one up? S. On 9 May 2005, at 15:41, John Price wrote: > I just joined the list after I got an email response from Joe Walnes=20= > telling me he=92s no longer involved in the NMock project.=A0 So the = first=20 > thing I wanted to suggest is an update to the nmock.org website with=20= > some more up-to-date contact info.=A0 My apologies if any of this has=20= > been recently addressed, but a quick look through the archives didn=92t=20= > reveal anything. > =A0 > More generally, it=92s not really clear where the =93official=94 = source for=20 > information on NMock is.=A0 Clicking on the =93Tracker=94 link on = NMock.org=20 > takes you to one bug tracking system, while another set of issues are=20= > tracked on SourceForge.=A0 In general, the only reference the = NMock.org=20 > page makes to SourceForge is for downloading source or binaries. > =A0 > Anyway, the reason I emailed Joe in the first place was that I ran=20 > into bug =93NMO-44=94 as tracked by the JIRA bug tracker (=93Using=20 > DynamicMock with inheriting interfaces throws NullReferenceException=94)= =20 > and think that I=92ve got a fix for it (and a unit test to check for=20= > it).=A0 How can I go about submitting my change back to the project = for=20 > review? > =A0 |
|
From: Nat P. <nat...@gm...> - 2005-05-13 10:00:37
|
On that topic, I've just about finished version 0.00000001 pre-alpha technology preview. Anybody want to play with it and give feedback? Also, where should I check it in? And what shall we call it -- nMock-2? jMock .NET? At the moment it's called SharpMock, but that's a crap name. --Nat. On 5/10/05, Steve Freeman <st...@m3...> wrote: > It's true that things have been very quiet for a while. At present, Nat > is cooking up a very nice-looking rewrite based on our experiences with > jMock (www.jmock.org). I don't have a .Net box at the moment, anyone > else want to volunteer to pick this one up? >=20 > S. >=20 > On 9 May 2005, at 15:41, John Price wrote: > > I just joined the list after I got an email response from Joe Walnes > > telling me he's no longer involved in the NMock project. So the first > > thing I wanted to suggest is an update to the nmock.org website with > > some more up-to-date contact info. My apologies if any of this has > > been recently addressed, but a quick look through the archives didn't > > reveal anything. > >=20 > > More generally, it's not really clear where the "official" source for > > information on NMock is. Clicking on the "Tracker" link on NMock.org > > takes you to one bug tracking system, while another set of issues are > > tracked on SourceForge. In general, the only reference the NMock.org > > page makes to SourceForge is for downloading source or binaries. > >=20 > > Anyway, the reason I emailed Joe in the first place was that I ran > > into bug "NMO-44" as tracked by the JIRA bug tracker ("Using > > DynamicMock with inheriting interfaces throws NullReferenceException") > > and think that I've got a fix for it (and a unit test to check for > > it). How can I go about submitting my change back to the project for > > review? > >=20 >=20 > |
|
From: <thi...@gm...> - 2005-05-13 11:24:28
|
> On that topic, I've just about finished version 0.00000001 pre-alpha > technology preview. Anybody want to play with it and give feedback? yep, i'd love to |
|
From: Johan A. <joh...@gm...> - 2005-05-23 11:42:15
|
On 5/11/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > On that topic, I've just about finished version 0.00000001 pre-alpha > technology preview. Anybody want to play with it and give feedback? >=20 > Also, where should I check it in? And what shall we call it -- > nMock-2? jMock .NET? At the moment it's called SharpMock, but that's a > crap name. >=20 > --Nat. Did you check in the code somewhere? I'd like to take a look, and if possible give feedback :) /Johan |
|
From: Mike R. <mik...@gm...> - 2005-05-13 10:08:25
|
On 5/11/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > On that topic, I've just about finished version 0.00000001 pre-alpha > technology preview. Anybody want to play with it and give feedback? Yup - count me in. > Also, where should I check it in? And what shall we call it? 'Susan' ? ;) If I were you I'd put it in a new tree in nmock for now. Just call it something completely random as a codename. But maybe not 'Susan'. Or 'Longhorn' - I think someone else got that one. Mike |
|
From: Owen R. <exo...@gm...> - 2005-05-13 11:12:29
|
hi nat, if you don't mind sending over the code, i can have a look at it and get a better idea of where the best place to put it might be. btw, if you include it under the current nmock cvs module then any changes committed will get picked by the ccnet instance over on http://ccnetlive.thoughtworks.com. granted it won't build your changes yet; i just wanted to let you know that the infrastructure is in place to do so. cheers, owen. On 5/13/05, Mike Roberts <mik...@gm...> wrote: > On 5/11/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > On that topic, I've just about finished version 0.00000001 pre-alpha > > technology preview. Anybody want to play with it and give feedback? >=20 > Yup - count me in. >=20 > > Also, where should I check it in? And what shall we call it? >=20 > 'Susan' ? ;) >=20 > If I were you I'd put it in a new tree in nmock for now. Just call it > something completely random as a codename. But maybe not 'Susan'. Or > 'Longhorn' - I think someone else got that one. >=20 > Mike >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes > Want to be the first software developer in space? > Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ids93&alloc_id=16281&opclick > _______________________________________________ > Nmock-general mailing list > Nmo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-general >=20 --=20 Owen Rogers | http://dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/exortech | CruiseControl.NET - http://ccnet.thoughtworks.com |
|
From: <thi...@gm...> - 2005-05-17 01:07:05
|
> More generally, it's not really clear where the "official" source for > information on NMock is. Clicking on the "Tracker" link on NMock.org tak= es > you to one bug tracking system, while another set of issues are tracked o= n > SourceForge. In general, the only reference the NMock.org page makes to > SourceForge is for downloading source or binaries. Steve, can't we just bring back the issues from sf to the Jira tracker, and close the sf one ? Having the two trackers is really confusing. > Anyway, the reason I emailed Joe in the first place was that I ran into b= ug > "NMO-44" as tracked by the JIRA bug tracker ("Using DynamicMock with > inheriting interfaces throws NullReferenceException") and think that I've > got a fix for it (and a unit test to check for it). How can I go about > submitting my change back to the project for review? Can you post the patch + tests here if you didn't send it already to someon= e ? Thibaut |
|
From: Steve F. <st...@m3...> - 2005-05-16 22:04:19
|
That's fine with me. Your call. S. On 16 May 2005, at 22:15, Thibaut Barr=E8re wrote: >> More generally, it's not really clear where the "official" source for >> information on NMock is. Clicking on the "Tracker" link on NMock.org=20= >> takes >> you to one bug tracking system, while another set of issues are=20 >> tracked on >> SourceForge. In general, the only reference the NMock.org page makes=20= >> to >> SourceForge is for downloading source or binaries. > > Steve, can't we just bring back the issues from sf to the Jira > tracker, and close the sf one ? Having the two trackers is really > confusing. > >> Anyway, the reason I emailed Joe in the first place was that I ran=20 >> into bug >> "NMO-44" as tracked by the JIRA bug tracker ("Using DynamicMock with >> inheriting interfaces throws NullReferenceException") and think that=20= >> I've >> got a fix for it (and a unit test to check for it). How can I go=20 >> about >> submitting my change back to the project for review? > > Can you post the patch + tests here if you didn't send it already to=20= > someone ? > > > Thibaut > > |
|
From: Owen R. <exo...@gm...> - 2005-05-17 02:27:55
|
> Steve, can't we just bring back the issues from sf to the Jira > tracker, and close the sf one ? Having the two trackers is really > confusing. +1. this is what we did on ccnet. the sf trackers are pretty poor and it is a headache to have to manage this in 2 places. thibaut: do you have sufficient access now to do this? cheers, owen. --=20 Owen Rogers | http://dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/exortech | CruiseControl.NET - http://ccnet.thoughtworks.com |
|
From: Nat P. <nat...@gm...> - 2005-05-24 09:14:12
|
Currently NMock2 throws NUnit's AssertionException when it detects a test failure. I can make it throw it's own exception (ExpectationException, say) so that it is entirely self contained. What do people think? On 5/23/05, Johan Appelgren <joh...@gm...> wrote: > Thank you, I'll try and take a look at it during the week. >=20 > Just opened the project to take a quick peek now and I noticed that > the mock project depends on nunit. Do you plan to make it dependant on > nunit? >=20 > /Johan >=20 > On 5/23/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > I haven't had a chance to check it in anywhere public yet... hopefully > > this week. I've attached a zip of the latest code. The attachment is > > a normal ZIP archive. > > > > --Nat. > > > > On 5/23/05, Johan Appelgren <joh...@gm...> wrote: > > > On 5/11/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > > > On that topic, I've just about finished version 0.00000001 pre-alph= a > > > > technology preview. Anybody want to play with it and give feedback= ? > > > > > > > > Also, where should I check it in? And what shall we call it -- > > > > nMock-2? jMock .NET? At the moment it's called SharpMock, but that'= s a > > > > crap name. > > > > > > > > --Nat. > > > > > > Did you check in the code somewhere? I'd like to take a look, and if > > > possible give feedback :) > > > > > > /Johan > > > > > > > > > > |
|
From: Mike R. <mik...@gm...> - 2005-05-24 09:19:15
|
On 5/24/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > Currently NMock2 throws NUnit's AssertionException when it detects a > test failure. I can make it throw it's own exception > (ExpectationException, say) so that it is entirely self contained. >=20 > What do people think? That seems a good idea to me. If NMock were to ever be a part of NUnit, then ExpectationException could just be made to sub-class AssertionException. But for now, I think breaking the dependency would be good. Mike |
|
From: <thi...@gm...> - 2005-05-24 09:26:42
|
I agree with Mike on both points... Thibaut |
|
From: Johan A. <joh...@gm...> - 2005-05-24 09:41:36
|
Sounds good to me.=20 /Johan On 5/24/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > Currently NMock2 throws NUnit's AssertionException when it detects a > test failure. I can make it throw it's own exception > (ExpectationException, say) so that it is entirely self contained. >=20 > What do people think? >=20 > On 5/23/05, Johan Appelgren <joh...@gm...> wrote: > > Thank you, I'll try and take a look at it during the week. > > > > Just opened the project to take a quick peek now and I noticed that > > the mock project depends on nunit. Do you plan to make it dependant on > > nunit? > > > > /Johan > > > > On 5/23/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > > I haven't had a chance to check it in anywhere public yet... hopefull= y > > > this week. I've attached a zip of the latest code. The attachment i= s > > > a normal ZIP archive. > > > > > > --Nat. > > > > > > On 5/23/05, Johan Appelgren <joh...@gm...> wrote: > > > > On 5/11/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > On that topic, I've just about finished version 0.00000001 pre-al= pha > > > > > technology preview. Anybody want to play with it and give feedba= ck? > > > > > > > > > > Also, where should I check it in? And what shall we call it -- > > > > > nMock-2? jMock .NET? At the moment it's called SharpMock, but tha= t's a > > > > > crap name. > > > > > > > > > > --Nat. > > > > > > > > Did you check in the code somewhere? I'd like to take a look, and i= f > > > > possible give feedback :) > > > > > > > > /Johan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
From: Nat P. <nat...@gm...> - 2005-05-24 10:33:33
|
Ok, I'll do that. I'll also make sure that all references to NUnit are removed from the codebase (Assert, mainly). --Nat. On 5/24/05, Johan Appelgren <joh...@gm...> wrote: > Sounds good to me. >=20 > /Johan >=20 > On 5/24/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > Currently NMock2 throws NUnit's AssertionException when it detects a > > test failure. I can make it throw it's own exception > > (ExpectationException, say) so that it is entirely self contained. > > > > What do people think? > > > > On 5/23/05, Johan Appelgren <joh...@gm...> wrote: > > > Thank you, I'll try and take a look at it during the week. > > > > > > Just opened the project to take a quick peek now and I noticed that > > > the mock project depends on nunit. Do you plan to make it dependant o= n > > > nunit? > > > > > > /Johan > > > > > > On 5/23/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > > > I haven't had a chance to check it in anywhere public yet... hopefu= lly > > > > this week. I've attached a zip of the latest code. The attachment= is > > > > a normal ZIP archive. > > > > > > > > --Nat. > > > > > > > > On 5/23/05, Johan Appelgren <joh...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > On 5/11/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > On that topic, I've just about finished version 0.00000001 pre-= alpha > > > > > > technology preview. Anybody want to play with it and give feed= back? > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, where should I check it in? And what shall we call it -- > > > > > > nMock-2? jMock .NET? At the moment it's called SharpMock, but t= hat's a > > > > > > crap name. > > > > > > > > > > > > --Nat. > > > > > > > > > > Did you check in the code somewhere? I'd like to take a look, and= if > > > > > possible give feedback :) > > > > > > > > > > /Johan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
