Re: [Nmock-general] Couple questions and suggestions

[Nat P. <nat...@gm...>]

Ok, I'll do that.  I'll also make sure that all references to NUnit
are removed from the codebase (Assert, mainly).

--Nat.

On 5/24/05, Johan Appelgren <joh...@gm...> wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>=20
> /Johan
>=20
> On 5/24/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote:
> > Currently NMock2 throws NUnit's AssertionException when it detects a
> > test failure.  I can make it throw it's own exception
> > (ExpectationException, say) so that it is entirely self contained.
> >
> > What do people think?
> >
> > On 5/23/05, Johan Appelgren <joh...@gm...> wrote:
> > > Thank you, I'll try and take a look at it during the week.
> > >
> > > Just opened the project to take a quick peek now and I noticed that
> > > the mock project depends on nunit. Do you plan to make it dependant o=
n
> > > nunit?
> > >
> > > /Johan
> > >
> > > On 5/23/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote:
> > > > I haven't had a chance to check it in anywhere public yet... hopefu=
lly
> > > > this week.  I've attached a zip of the latest code.  The attachment=
 is
> > > > a normal ZIP archive.
> > > >
> > > > --Nat.
> > > >
> > > > On 5/23/05, Johan Appelgren <joh...@gm...> wrote:
> > > > > On 5/11/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote:
> > > > > > On that topic, I've just about finished version 0.00000001 pre-=
alpha
> > > > > > technology preview.  Anybody want to play with it and give feed=
back?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also, where should I check it in? And what shall we call it --
> > > > > > nMock-2? jMock .NET? At the moment it's called SharpMock, but t=
hat's a
> > > > > > crap name.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --Nat.
> > > > >
> > > > > Did you check in the code somewhere? I'd like to take a look, and=
 if
> > > > > possible give feedback :)
> > > > >
> > > > > /Johan
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>