Re: [Nmock-general] Couple questions and suggestions

[Johan A. <joh...@gm...>]

Sounds good to me.=20

/Johan

On 5/24/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote:
> Currently NMock2 throws NUnit's AssertionException when it detects a
> test failure.  I can make it throw it's own exception
> (ExpectationException, say) so that it is entirely self contained.
>=20
> What do people think?
>=20
> On 5/23/05, Johan Appelgren <joh...@gm...> wrote:
> > Thank you, I'll try and take a look at it during the week.
> >
> > Just opened the project to take a quick peek now and I noticed that
> > the mock project depends on nunit. Do you plan to make it dependant on
> > nunit?
> >
> > /Johan
> >
> > On 5/23/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote:
> > > I haven't had a chance to check it in anywhere public yet... hopefull=
y
> > > this week.  I've attached a zip of the latest code.  The attachment i=
s
> > > a normal ZIP archive.
> > >
> > > --Nat.
> > >
> > > On 5/23/05, Johan Appelgren <joh...@gm...> wrote:
> > > > On 5/11/05, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote:
> > > > > On that topic, I've just about finished version 0.00000001 pre-al=
pha
> > > > > technology preview.  Anybody want to play with it and give feedba=
ck?
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, where should I check it in? And what shall we call it --
> > > > > nMock-2? jMock .NET? At the moment it's called SharpMock, but tha=
t's a
> > > > > crap name.
> > > > >
> > > > > --Nat.
> > > >
> > > > Did you check in the code somewhere? I'd like to take a look, and i=
f
> > > > possible give feedback :)
> > > >
> > > > /Johan
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>