From: Zoran V. <zv...@ar...> - 2006-10-07 15:38:05
|
On 07.10.2006, at 17:23, Stephen Deasey wrote: > > The caller doesn't have a time budget for executing the code in the > slave, they have a budget for sending the code, executing it, and > receiving the result. So yes, if it takes 5.01 secs with one byte > remaining, you fail. No crystal ball. OK. > > The more useful info we can gather the better, I think. Allright. I buy this. So, trash all those timeouts, apply a general (-evaltimeout) to the whole request and bite off that time as we hop thru the processs. At any point where we had to give-up because ot the timeout, we maintain a counter of errors for that spot. That was a hard birth... but I believe we now all have the clear picture about that aspect. What remains: naming of the module API (handle vs. handle-free) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn > cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php? > page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > naviserver-devel mailing list > nav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel |