mpls-linux-general — Mailing list for general discussion about MPLS for Linux

Re: [mpls-linux-general] vpn ip

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

I'm assuming your refering to L3 VPNs based on RFC2547bis, if so, the
answer is no.  There is work towards it, but nothing usable.

On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 06:27:08PM +0200, A fond Sur MPLS wrote:
> Hi everybody
>=20
> I have just discovered MPLS Linux and I would like to
> know if it is possible to implement a VPN/IP solution
> in order to make a demonstration of this technology.
>=20
> Thanks a lot
>=20
>=20
> =09
>=20
> =09
> 	=09
> __________________________________________________________________
> D?couvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos m=
ails !=20
> Cr?ez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] vpn ip

[A f. S. M. <afo...@ya...>]

Hi everybody

I have just discovered MPLS Linux and I would like to
know if it is possible to implement a VPN/IP solution
in order to make a demonstration of this technology.

Thanks a lot


	

	
		
__________________________________________________________________
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails ! 
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/

[mpls-linux-general] DDrugsByMail: 99-57

[Valorie B. <Va...@jd...>]

Hello, 

better than Captain Blood, was engaged in solving the curious pro
On the contrary.  The others are all worthy rebels.  I am not.
He turned to issue orders, and the fort became lively as a hive.
a short, stabbing laugh.  Yet in spite of that you went with him
My God! cried Bishop in a sudden increase of panic.
Blood laughed outright.  Oh, I'd never serve ye such a bad turn
what's happened to you.  D' ye think we can do without a navigato


this desertion of his post.  What if it were deliberate, eh?  Wha


Have a nice day.

Re: [mpls-linux-general] May I ask you a questions about labelspace

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

Very good point.  The ldpd labelspace CLI is cruft leftover from
quagga-ldp.  It should be removed.

The correct place to configure labelspace is in zebra.  Ofcourse we
need make sure that setting a labelspace in zebra causes the right mesg
to be sent to ldpd.

Would you like to try making these changes and send me a patch?

On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 02:47:37PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote:
> Hi James,
>=20
> May I ask you a questions about labelspace?
>=20
> What's the different between we config labelspace through zebra CLI and l=
dpd CLI? I mean it seems I can config the labelspace through zebra CLI and =
through ldpd CLI? But there should be something different? I am not so sure=
, please correct me, thanks.
>=20
>=20
> Best Regards
>=20
> Timothy
> 2005.03.25
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] May I ask you a questions about labelspace

[<m9...@cn...>]

Hi James,

May I ask you a questions about labelspace?

What's the different between we config labelspace through zebra CLI and =
ldpd CLI? I mean it seems I can config the labelspace through zebra CLI =
and through ldpd CLI? But there should be something different? I am not =
so sure, please correct me, thanks.


Best Regards

Timothy
2005.03.25

Re: [mpls-linux-general] I think I find what causes the ldpd can't run in my PC

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:00:05PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote:
> Hi James,
>=20
> I think I find the problem that what caused ldpd "Aborted".
>=20
> The problem is in the config file in "/usr/local/etc/ldpd.conf".
>=20
> When I modify the file into below showing, ldpd can run, and there is no =
interface delete message showed.
>=20
> !
> ! Zebra configuration saved from vty
> !   2002/03/23 17:07:30
> !
> hostname uml-1
> password root
> enable password root
>=20
>=20
> The original config file is: (I add the line number in order to explain)
> 1.    !
> 2.    ! Zebra configuration saved from vty
> 3.    !   2002/03/23 17:07:30
> 4.    !
> 5.    hostname uml-1
> 6.    password root
> 7.    enable password root
> 8.    !
> 9.    mpls ip
> 10.  !
> 11.  interface lo
> 12.  !
> 13.  interface eth0
> 14.  mpls ip
> 15.  !
> 16.  line vty
> 17.  !
>=20
> There are two error in this config file:
> 1. In line 9, the "mpls ip" should change to "mpls ldp"
> 2. Before I modify this file into above style, the error showed again.
>    ldpd: ldp_interface.c:46: ldp_interface_create2: Assertion `li->iff.in=
dex' failed.
>    Aborted
>=20
> I am not sure does this problem related to the  source code?

There probably is still a bug.  So the error only occurs when you start
ldpd with an existing config.  That explains why you're seeing it and I do
not.  I re-configure ldpd from scratch each time.  I will try starting
ldpd with an existing config and see what I find.

Thank you for your diligent work.  I know this must be a frustrating proces=
s,
but your work has already helped improved ldpd.

> Thanks

Thank you.

> Best Regards
>=20
> Timothy
> 2005.03.23

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] ./update-autotools fail

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:58:52AM +0100, Jorge Garc?a wrote:
> I am trying to comile quagga-ldp ang ldp-portable. I have sync the

I think that might be your problem.  You need quagga-mpls not quagga-ldp.
(you are correct in getting ldp-portable as well).
quagga-ldp was a proof concept tree, it it not longer being developed.
quagga-mpls has more functionality anyway (it just doesn't work yet, that
is all :-)

> latest code of P4.
> I have followed the step to compile. First i've created de links and
> when i do update-autotools I view this fail. What is wrong?
>=20
> root@localhost quagga-mpls]# ./update-autotools
> This ./update-autotools script is deprecated, and will be removed at
> some stage.Please use the 'autoreconf' command included with autoconf.
> TOOLS VERIONS:
> autoheader (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
> ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.6 (1.1220.2.95 2004/04/11 05:50:42)
> libtoolize (GNU libtool) 1.5.6
> aclocal (GNU automake) 1.8.3
> automake (GNU automake) 1.8.3
> UPDATING:
> /usr/share/aclocal/libmikmod.m4:11: warning: underquoted definition of
> AM_PATH_LIBMIKMOD
>   run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
>   or see
> http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending%20aclocal
> ' is already registered with AC_CONFIG_FILES.
> autoconf/status.m4:848: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from...
> configure.ac:1221: the top level
> autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1
> aclocal: autom4te failed with exit status: 1
> ' is already registered with AC_CONFIG_FILES.
> autoconf/status.m4:848: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from...
> configure.ac:1221: the top level
> autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1
> autoheader: /usr/bin/autom4te failed with exit status: 1
> ' is already registered with AC_CONFIG_FILES.
> autoconf/status.m4:848: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from...
> configure.ac:1221: the top level
> autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1
> You should add the contents of `/usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4' to
> `aclocal.m4'.
> libtoolize: `config.guess' exists: use `--force' to overwrite
> libtoolize: `config.sub' exists: use `--force' to overwrite
> libtoolize: `ltmain.sh' exists: use `--force' to overwrite
> ' is already registered with AC_CONFIG_FILES.
> autoconf/status.m4:848: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from...
> configure.ac:1221: the top level
> autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1
> automake: autoconf failed with exit status: 1
> [root@localhost quagga-mpls]#
>=20
> Thanks for your attention
> Jorge Garcia
> jo...@sa...
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
> Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
> for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6882&alloc_id=3D15148&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] Re: [mpls-linux-devel] code

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:41:20AM +0000, gemini murthy wrote:
> hai,
> i,m gemini.the code which was given by you executed successfully.but i ca=
n,t know where the executed code is stored.please tell me where it is store=
d and how to see the output.send the source code for the executable file wh=
ich you send to me.send the c source code instead of sending the web addres=
s.please help me.

I'm confused as to why you need me to send you the source files.  Did the
URL I send you not work?  Was the tar file corrupt?  If not, why can't
you get the source files yourself?  There must be some reason, please
explain.

PS Please send _all_ mpls-linux requests via the mailing list, not directly
to my personal email address (ie hit 'reply all' instead of just 'reply')

> thank you,
> bye,
> gemini.
>=20
> "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:02:49AM +0000, gemini murthy wrote:
> > Hai,
> > I am gemini.Thanks for sending the code.If you don't mind ,please send =
the code for comparison between IP and MPLS and also for any application fo=
r MPLS.
>=20
> Sorry I don't understand what you're asking for. All of the code
> written for mpls-linux is availble at the web site, I have nothing
> else to offer.
>=20
> PS Please send _all_ mpls-linux requests via the mailing list, not direct=
ly
> to my personal email address (ie hit 'reply all' instead of just 'reply')
>=20
> > Bye,
> > gemini.
> >=20
> > "James R. Leu" wrote:
> > You can get all of the mpls-linux source code from:
> >=20
> > http://mpls-linux.sourceforge.net/
> >=20
> > If you want the source code only, download mpls-linux-1.946.tar.bz2
> >=20
> > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/mpls-linux/mpls-linux-1.946.tar.bz2?=
download
> >=20
> > In there you will find patch files for all of the relative components.
> >=20
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 05:42:11AM +0000, gemini murthy wrote:
> > > Hai,
> > > I am gemini,doing final year engineering project.I want the simple so=
urce code for the implementation of MPLS.please send me the code which shou=
ld be executed.send and reply me immediately
> > >=20
> > > bye,
> > > gemini
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline.
> > --=20
> > James R. Leu
> > jl...@mi...
> >=20
> > Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline.
> --=20
> James R. Leu
> jl...@mi...
>=20
> Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline.
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] I think I find what causes the ldpd can't run in my PC

[<m9...@cn...>]

Hi James,

I think I find the problem that what caused ldpd "Aborted".

The problem is in the config file in "/usr/local/etc/ldpd.conf".

When I modify the file into below showing, ldpd can run, and there is no =
interface delete message showed.

!
! Zebra configuration saved from vty
!   2002/03/23 17:07:30
!
hostname uml-1
password root
enable password root


The original config file is: (I add the line number in order to explain)
1.    !
2.    ! Zebra configuration saved from vty
3.    !   2002/03/23 17:07:30
4.    !
5.    hostname uml-1
6.    password root
7.    enable password root
8.    !
9.    mpls ip
10.  !
11.  interface lo
12.  !
13.  interface eth0
14.  mpls ip
15.  !
16.  line vty
17.  !

There are two error in this config file:
1. In line 9, the "mpls ip" should change to "mpls ldp"
2. Before I modify this file into above style, the error showed again.
   ldpd: ldp_interface.c:46: ldp_interface_create2: Assertion =
`li->iff.index' failed.
   Aborted

I am not sure does this problem related to the  source code?

Thanks


Best Regards

Timothy
2005.03.23

[mpls-linux-general] ./update-autotools fail

[Jorge <jo...@sa...>]

I am trying to comile quagga-ldp ang ldp-portable. I have sync the
latest code of P4.
I have followed the step to compile. First i've created de links and
when i do update-autotools I view this fail. What is wrong?

root@localhost quagga-mpls]# ./update-autotools
This ./update-autotools script is deprecated, and will be removed at
some stage.Please use the 'autoreconf' command included with autoconf.
TOOLS VERIONS:
autoheader (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.6 (1.1220.2.95 2004/04/11 05:50:42)
libtoolize (GNU libtool) 1.5.6
aclocal (GNU automake) 1.8.3
automake (GNU automake) 1.8.3
UPDATING:
/usr/share/aclocal/libmikmod.m4:11: warning: underquoted definition of
AM_PATH_LIBMIKMOD
  run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
  or see
http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending%20aclocal
' is already registered with AC_CONFIG_FILES.
autoconf/status.m4:848: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from...
configure.ac:1221: the top level
autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1
aclocal: autom4te failed with exit status: 1
' is already registered with AC_CONFIG_FILES.
autoconf/status.m4:848: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from...
configure.ac:1221: the top level
autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1
autoheader: /usr/bin/autom4te failed with exit status: 1
' is already registered with AC_CONFIG_FILES.
autoconf/status.m4:848: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from...
configure.ac:1221: the top level
autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1
You should add the contents of `/usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4' to
`aclocal.m4'.
libtoolize: `config.guess' exists: use `--force' to overwrite
libtoolize: `config.sub' exists: use `--force' to overwrite
libtoolize: `ltmain.sh' exists: use `--force' to overwrite
' is already registered with AC_CONFIG_FILES.
autoconf/status.m4:848: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from...
configure.ac:1221: the top level
autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1
automake: autoconf failed with exit status: 1
[root@localhost quagga-mpls]#

Thanks for your attention
Jorge Garcia
jo...@sa...

[mpls-linux-general] Re: Ddrugs UXT:12

[Korbin M. <Ji...@je...>]

Hello, 

it was.  He was clear on the matter of the easily successful raid

face suddenly white and drawn.
You never heard me?  How should you have heard me when you weren
Cross at Bridgewater - as it bad been posted also at Taunton and
can be thinking of such things?
jurors to mutter in the ear of a brother counsel:

alone has stood between Bishop and his hate of you.  If now he ca



Have a nice day.

Re: [mpls-linux-general] LDP aborted when enable ldp on an interface

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

Also, what change number are you on?

cd quagga-mpls
p4 changes ... | head -1
cd ldp-portable
p4 changes ... | head -1

On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:32:02PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote:
> Hi James,
> I am trying the latest code now. But I still hit the same problem. I can'=
t enable ldp on an interface.
>=20
> The command sequence I set was:
> uml-1# conf t
> uml-1(config)# mpls ldp
> uml-1(config-ldp)# trace all
> uml-1(config-ldp)# exit
> uml-1(config)#interface eth1
> uml-1(config-if)# mpls ip
> Connection closed by foreign host.
>=20
> then ldp Aborted
>=20
>=20
>=20
> And the tracefile:
> [root@localhost ldpd]# ./ldpd
> addr delete: 0x80b53e8
> if delete: 0x80b1fc0
> if delete: 0x80b56e0
> ldpd: ldp_interface.c:46: ldp_interface_create2: Assertion `li->iff.index=
' failed.
> Aborted
>=20
> I didn't unconfig an interface then config it. The "Did this interface ha=
ve an IP address configured on it", do you mean did I config IP for this in=
terface? (If this is what you mean, my answer is yes.)
>=20
> Do I need to log in zebra daemon (by vtysh) to config something before I =
am going to try ldp?
>=20
> Thanks
>=20
> Timothy
> 2005.03.22
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] LDP aborted when enable ldp on an interface

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

Hmmm.  I issue these exact command here and they work fine.  There must
be something in our setups that are different.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:32:02PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote:
> Hi James,
> I am trying the latest code now. But I still hit the same problem. I can'=
t enable ldp on an interface.
>=20
> The command sequence I set was:
> uml-1# conf t
> uml-1(config)# mpls ldp
> uml-1(config-ldp)# trace all
> uml-1(config-ldp)# exit
> uml-1(config)#interface eth1
> uml-1(config-if)# mpls ip
> Connection closed by foreign host.
>=20
> then ldp Aborted
>=20
>=20
>=20
> And the tracefile:
> [root@localhost ldpd]# ./ldpd

These 3 lines are suspiscious.  I do not understand why an address and two
interfaces would be deleted based on the commands you've typed in.

> addr delete: 0x80b53e8
> if delete: 0x80b1fc0
> if delete: 0x80b56e0
> ldpd: ldp_interface.c:46: ldp_interface_create2: Assertion `li->iff.index=
' failed.
> Aborted
>=20
> I didn't unconfig an interface then config it. The "Did this interface ha=
ve an IP address configured on it", do you mean did I config IP for this in=
terface? (If this is what you mean, my answer is yes.)
>=20
> Do I need to log in zebra daemon (by vtysh) to config something before I =
am going to try ldp?

How did you configure the IP address?  I think know what is different in
our setups, I configure everything via zebra or ldpd (IP address, default
route, etc) and my guess is that you configure the interfaces via system
files (ifcfg-eth1 etc).  I'll try configuring the IP address via the system
commands and see if I can reproduce.

> Thanks
>=20
> Timothy
> 2005.03.22
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] LDP aborted when enable ldp on an interface

[<m9...@cn...>]

Hi James,
I am trying the latest code now. But I still hit the same problem. I =
can't enable ldp on an interface.

The command sequence I set was:
uml-1# conf t
uml-1(config)# mpls ldp
uml-1(config-ldp)# trace all
uml-1(config-ldp)# exit
uml-1(config)#interface eth1
uml-1(config-if)# mpls ip
Connection closed by foreign host.

then ldp Aborted



And the tracefile:
[root@localhost ldpd]# ./ldpd
addr delete: 0x80b53e8
if delete: 0x80b1fc0
if delete: 0x80b56e0
ldpd: ldp_interface.c:46: ldp_interface_create2: Assertion =
`li->iff.index' failed.
Aborted

I didn't unconfig an interface then config it. The "Did this interface =
have an IP address configured on it", do you mean did I config IP for =
this interface? (If this is what you mean, my answer is yes.)

Do I need to log in zebra daemon (by vtysh) to config something before I =
am going to try ldp?

Thanks

Timothy
2005.03.22

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Some compiling error

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

Make sure to update ldp-portable, I just submitted a fix for
a bug where an entity could be 'shutdown' twice, which caused
some memory coruption.

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:39:04PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote:
> Hi James,
>=20
> I am trying the latest quagga-mpls and ldp-portable now.
>=20
> My Linux has mpls enhancement now. (I can choice to run it o not in the s=
tart menu)
>=20
> If I keep the "mpls_method =3D mpls_netlink.o" in zebra/Makefile.am", the=
n I can't make. Following are the error message:
>=20
> mpls_netlink.c: In function `mpls_ctrl_nhlfe_register':
> mpls_netlink.c:76: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IFNAME' undeclared (first use in =
this function)
> mpls_netlink.c:76: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only on=
ce
> mpls_netlink.c:76: error: for each function it appears in.)
> mpls_netlink.c:82: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV4' undeclared (first use in th=
is function)
> mpls_netlink.c:89: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV6' undeclared (first use in th=
is function)
> mpls_netlink.c: In function `netlink_mpls':
> mpls_netlink.c:299: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV4' undeclared (first use in t=
his function)
> mpls_netlink.c:299: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IFNAME' undeclared (first use in=
 this function)
> mpls_netlink.c: In function `mpls_ctrl_read':
> mpls_netlink.c:377: warning: implicit declaration of function `set_netlin=
k_blocking'
> mpls_netlink.c:379: warning: implicit declaration of function `zlog'
> mpls_netlink.c:384: warning: implicit declaration of function `netlink_re=
quest'
> mpls_netlink.c:387: warning: implicit declaration of function `netlink_pa=
rse_info'
> mpls_netlink.c:417: warning: implicit declaration of function `set_netlin=
k_nonblocking'
> make[2]: *** [mpls_netlink.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/tim/testing/version4/quagga-mpls/zebra'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/tim/testing/version4/quagga-mpls'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>=20
> Best Regards
>=20
> Timothy
> 2005.03.21
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Some compiling error

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

Sync your tree and try again, I think change 1118 will fix this for you.

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:39:04PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote:
> Hi James,
>=20
> I am trying the latest quagga-mpls and ldp-portable now.
>=20
> My Linux has mpls enhancement now. (I can choice to run it o not in the s=
tart menu)
>=20
> If I keep the "mpls_method =3D mpls_netlink.o" in zebra/Makefile.am", the=
n I can't make. Following are the error message:
>=20
> mpls_netlink.c: In function `mpls_ctrl_nhlfe_register':
> mpls_netlink.c:76: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IFNAME' undeclared (first use in =
this function)
> mpls_netlink.c:76: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only on=
ce
> mpls_netlink.c:76: error: for each function it appears in.)
> mpls_netlink.c:82: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV4' undeclared (first use in th=
is function)
> mpls_netlink.c:89: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV6' undeclared (first use in th=
is function)
> mpls_netlink.c: In function `netlink_mpls':
> mpls_netlink.c:299: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV4' undeclared (first use in t=
his function)
> mpls_netlink.c:299: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IFNAME' undeclared (first use in=
 this function)
> mpls_netlink.c: In function `mpls_ctrl_read':
> mpls_netlink.c:377: warning: implicit declaration of function `set_netlin=
k_blocking'
> mpls_netlink.c:379: warning: implicit declaration of function `zlog'
> mpls_netlink.c:384: warning: implicit declaration of function `netlink_re=
quest'
> mpls_netlink.c:387: warning: implicit declaration of function `netlink_pa=
rse_info'
> mpls_netlink.c:417: warning: implicit declaration of function `set_netlin=
k_nonblocking'
> make[2]: *** [mpls_netlink.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/tim/testing/version4/quagga-mpls/zebra'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/tim/testing/version4/quagga-mpls'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>=20
> Best Regards
>=20
> Timothy
> 2005.03.21
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] LDP aborted when enable ldp on an interface

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

=46rom the trace you sent it looks like right before this you unconfiged
an interface, then configured this one?  Can you send the exact
command sequence? (in general when you hit a bug, try to send me the
exact command sequence that caused the failure and the relative portion
of the tracefile.)

If you unconfigured an interface and then configured an interface,
I think you can look in ldpd/ldp_interface.c at create/create2
delete/delete2 code to start debugging.

Did this interface have an IP address configured on it?  It is a real
interface on the device that is operational?

On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:06:57AM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote:
> Hi James,
>=20
> In the latest code of "quagga-mpls" and "ldp-portable", I can't not enabl=
e ldp on an interface.
>=20
> [root@localhost ldpd]# ./ldpd
> addr delete: 0x80993e0
> if delete: 0x8095fb8
> if delete: 0x80996d8
> ENTER: ldp_cfg_if_set
> EXIT: ldp_cfg_if_set
> ENTER: ldp_cfg_global_get
> EXIT: ldp_cfg_global_get
> lt-ldpd: ldp_interface.c:46: ldp_interface_create2: Assertion `li->iff.in=
dex' failed.
> Aborted
>=20
> After tracing, I find that the value of "li->iff.index" is zero. Where I =
can help to fix or I should dig in?
>=20
> Best Regards
>=20
> Timothy
> 2005.03.21
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] LDP aborted when enable ldp on an interface

[<m9...@cn...>]

Hi James,

In the latest code of "quagga-mpls" and "ldp-portable", I can't not =
enable ldp on an interface.

[root@localhost ldpd]# ./ldpd
addr delete: 0x80993e0
if delete: 0x8095fb8
if delete: 0x80996d8
ENTER: ldp_cfg_if_set
EXIT: ldp_cfg_if_set
ENTER: ldp_cfg_global_get
EXIT: ldp_cfg_global_get
lt-ldpd: ldp_interface.c:46: ldp_interface_create2: Assertion =
`li->iff.index' failed.
Aborted

After tracing, I find that the value of "li->iff.index" is zero. Where I =
can help to fix or I should dig in?

Best Regards

Timothy
2005.03.21

[mpls-linux-general] Some compiling error

[<m9...@cn...>]

Hi James,

I am trying the latest quagga-mpls and ldp-portable now.

My Linux has mpls enhancement now. (I can choice to run it o not in the =
start menu)

If I keep the "mpls_method =3D mpls_netlink.o" in zebra/Makefile.am", =
then I can't make. Following are the error message:

mpls_netlink.c: In function `mpls_ctrl_nhlfe_register':
mpls_netlink.c:76: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IFNAME' undeclared (first use in =
this function)
mpls_netlink.c:76: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only =
once
mpls_netlink.c:76: error: for each function it appears in.)
mpls_netlink.c:82: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV4' undeclared (first use in =
this function)
mpls_netlink.c:89: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV6' undeclared (first use in =
this function)
mpls_netlink.c: In function `netlink_mpls':
mpls_netlink.c:299: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IPV4' undeclared (first use in =
this function)
mpls_netlink.c:299: error: `NEXTHOP_TYPE_IFNAME' undeclared (first use =
in this function)
mpls_netlink.c: In function `mpls_ctrl_read':
mpls_netlink.c:377: warning: implicit declaration of function =
`set_netlink_blocking'
mpls_netlink.c:379: warning: implicit declaration of function `zlog'
mpls_netlink.c:384: warning: implicit declaration of function =
`netlink_request'
mpls_netlink.c:387: warning: implicit declaration of function =
`netlink_parse_info'
mpls_netlink.c:417: warning: implicit declaration of function =
`set_netlink_nonblocking'
make[2]: *** [mpls_netlink.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory =
`/root/tim/testing/version4/quagga-mpls/zebra'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/tim/testing/version4/quagga-mpls'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Best Regards

Timothy
2005.03.21

Re: [mpls-linux-general] More about "quagga+ldp" works on MPLS

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:25:04PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote:
> Hi James,
>=20
> Thanks for your help. I can get the latest code from the "P4 server" now.
>=20
> I get the latest code that you just update, thanks. I am going to test it.
>=20
> In your explanation, I can clearly understand the state and problem of th=
is project.
>=20
> I have few more questions to make sure my thought is right:
>=20
> 1. In "quagga-ldp", how does it implement "label" related operation (e.g.=
 after label binding, write this label to the kernel "NHLFE"....)? Or in th=
is version there has no implementation of this part?

In quagga-ldp, the ldpd daemon issued label operations directly to the
kernel.  In quagga-mpls, label operations are sent via the zserve API and
the zebra daemon then issues them to the kernel.

> 2. So the "quagga-mpls" will let quagga can work on mpls enhanced kernel,=
 and the implementation will follow zclient & zserver  communication model?=
=20

Yes.

> 3. I should patch my kernel with mpls enhancement, if I wnat to run the "=
quagga-mpls" code?

The only reason you will need to run on a mpls enabled kernel is
if you want to test the data path.  I think there are still a couple of
significant bugs that will prevent us from getting that far, so at this=20
point I don't think you _need_ to run an mpls enabled kernel.

>=20
> Thanks
>=20
> Best Regards
>=20
> Timothy
> 2005.03.18
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] More about "quagga+ldp" works on MPLS

[<m9...@cn...>]

Hi James,

Thanks for your help. I can get the latest code from the "P4 server" =
now.

I get the latest code that you just update, thanks. I am going to test =
it.

In your explanation, I can clearly understand the state and problem of =
this project.

I have few more questions to make sure my thought is right:

1. In "quagga-ldp", how does it implement "label" related operation =
(e.g. after label binding, write this label to the kernel "NHLFE"....)? =
Or in this version there has no implementation of this part?
2. So the "quagga-mpls" will let quagga can work on mpls enhanced =
kernel, and the implementation will follow zclient & zserver  =
communication model?=20
3. I should patch my kernel with mpls enhancement, if I wnat to run the =
"quagga-mpls" code?

Thanks

Best Regards

Timothy
2005.03.18

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Can't login toP4 server

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

I found a couple of refcnt bugs in ldp-portable. The global and entity
lifecycle as controlled by quagga-mpls is looking better.  Update your
tree, compile, then try the global enable/disable and interface
enable/disable tests we talked about many weeks ago.



On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 05:34:17PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote:
> Hi James,
>=20
> The p4 server seems not ready for us to login.
>=20
> [root@localhost bin]# ./p4 client
> Perforce client error:
>         Connect to server failed; check $P4PORT.
>         TCP connect to leu.dangermen.com:1666 failed.
>         connect: leu.dangermen.com:1666: Connection refused
>=20
> Thanks for your help.
>=20
> Best Regards
>=20
> Timothy
> 2005.03.15
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] More about "quagga+ldp" works on MPLS

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

One clarification is that in the p4 depot the directory is called quagga-mp=
ls.
(there is a quagga-ldp directory, but that is the old non-mpls infrastructu=
re
implementation).

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:26:45PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote:
> Hi James,
>=20
> I want to make sure the key problem of "quagga+ldp" is not ready for user=
s" is that quagga did not have any infrastructure for MPLS. And you finish =
this part, but still have some problem.

Correct quagga-mpls has the MPLS infrastructure.  The ldpd daemon tries
to use that infrastructure.  There are bugs in the implementation of ldpd
'porting layer'.  The porting layer is all of the code that convert quagga
info into ldp-portable info and makes the calls to the ldp-portable library.

> Could you tell me more concepts about this part, I mean what we need to d=
o to let  "quagga+ldp" can work on MPLS, what're the main functions we need=
 to implement. And which code I can pay attention to dig in?

In your tree that you compile from, all of the code in the ldpd directory
which is not a symbolic link into the ldp-portable directory is what makes
up the porting layer.  I think that the majority of the bugs can be found
there.

Were you able to sync your client?

>=20
> Thanks
>=20
> Best Regards
>=20
> Timothy
> 2005.03.17
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] More about "quagga+ldp" works on MPLS

[<m9...@cn...>]

Hi James,

I want to make sure the key problem of "quagga+ldp" is not ready for =
users" is that quagga did not have any infrastructure for MPLS. And you =
finish this part, but still have some problem.

Could you tell me more concepts about this part, I mean what we need to =
do to let  "quagga+ldp" can work on MPLS, what're the main functions we =
need to implement. And which code I can pay attention to dig in?

Thanks

Best Regards

Timothy
2005.03.17

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Pim's RSVP-TE?

[Steven V. d. B. <ste...@ug...>]

Hi Jorge,

The RSVP-TE daemon can still be found on:

http://dsmpls.atlantis.ugent.be/

Note that there hasn't been any active development on it for over quite som=
e=20
time now (but it should be fully functional with the versions on the=20
website).

Cheers,
Steven

On Thursday 17 March 2005 08:42, Jorge Garc=EDa wrote:
> Hello,
>  Anybody knows what is "Pim's RSVP-TE implementation". It is
> operational?, and where i can found it? I think that it is interesting
> for me.
>
> Thanks for your attention
>
> Jorge Garcia
> jo...@sa...
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

=2D-=20
Steven Van den Berghe
Department of Information Technology
Ghent University - IBBT - IMEC
http://www.ibcn.intec.ugent.be
Tel: +32 (0) 9 331 49 73
=46ax: +32 (0) 9 331 48 99