mpls-linux-general Mailing List for MPLS for Linux (Page 77)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
Menu
▾
▴
mpls-linux-general — Mailing list for general discussion about MPLS for Linux
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(26) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(71) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(123) |
Mar
(67) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(75) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(79) |
Oct
(85) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(39) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(74) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(105) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(91) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(62) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(63) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
|
From: jrussi <jr...@uo...> - 2005-04-04 23:26:10
|
Dear All,
What is going wrong with my commands? Please see bellow. Is
multiple pops to work only with labelspace 0? Even so, it=B4s
not counting the correct number of pops, and allowing
without error multpiples pops at other labelspaces, but
counting wrong (see label 1000, labelspace 1, 3 pops) ...:
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1000 labelspace 5
instructions pop pop peek
RTNETLINK answers: No such process
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1000 labelspace 0
instructions pop pop peek
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1000 labelspace 1
instructions pop pop peek
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1000 labelspace 2
instructions pop pop peek
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1001 labelspace 3
instructions pop pop peek
RTNETLINK answers: No such process
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1001 labelspace 4
instructions pop pop peek
RTNETLINK answers: No such process
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1001 labelspace 0
instructions pop pop pop peek
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1001 labelspace 1
instructions pop pop pop peek
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1001 labelspace 2
instructions pop pop pop peek
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1001 labelspace 3
instructions pop pop pop peek
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1001 labelspace 4
instructions pop pop pop peek
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1001 labelspace 5
instructions pop pop pop peek
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1001 labelspace 6
instructions pop pop pop peek
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1001 labelspace 7
instructions pop pop pop pop peek
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm add label gen 1002 labelspace 7
instructions pop pop pop pop peek
RTNETLINK answers: No such process
[root@localhost ~]# mpls ilm show
ILM entry label gen 1001 labelspace 7 proto ipv4
pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
ILM entry label gen 1001 labelspace 6 proto ipv4
pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
ILM entry label gen 1001 labelspace 5 proto ipv4
pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
ILM entry label gen 1001 labelspace 4 proto ipv4
pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
ILM entry label gen 1001 labelspace 3 proto ipv4
pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
ILM entry label gen 1001 labelspace 2 proto ipv4
pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
ILM entry label gen 1001 labelspace 1 proto ipv4
pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
ILM entry label gen 1001 labelspace 0 proto ipv4
pop pop pop pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
ILM entry label gen 1000 labelspace 2 proto ipv4
pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
ILM entry label gen 1000 labelspace 1 proto ipv4
pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
ILM entry label gen 1000 labelspace 0 proto ipv4
pop pop peek (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
[root@localhost ~]#
=0A =0A__________________________________________________________________=
________=0AAcabe com aquelas janelinhas que pulam na sua tela.=0AAntiPop-=
up UOL - =C9 gr=E1tis!=0Ahttp://antipopup.uol.com.br/=0A
|
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-04-04 21:58:50
|
Start by looking at http://mpls-linux.sf.net On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:51:45PM +0200, Ra?l Gil wrote: > I'm a student of university of Catalonia and I'm doing my project. > This project consist of mounting a MPLS network with 5 pc's and do > testing. The network consist of two users and three MPLS routers (pc's > where I install the software). >=20 > I want to know as the software is in use in order that the three pc's > actuate like MPLS routers. >=20 > I need to send traffic from a user to other one passing for the three > MPLS routers so that these mark the packages with MPLS etiquettes. > Then when I capture traffic with the ethereal to be able to see the > MPLS etiquettes. >=20 > Please, I would like to know as I must install the software and as it wor= ks. >=20 > Thanks, I do not have long time. >=20 > Ra?l Gil. >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id=14396&op?k > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: <rau...@gm...> - 2005-04-04 21:51:53
|
I'm a student of university of Catalonia and I'm doing my project. This project consist of mounting a MPLS network with 5 pc's and do testing. The network consist of two users and three MPLS routers (pc's where I install the software). I want to know as the software is in use in order that the three pc's actuate like MPLS routers. I need to send traffic from a user to other one passing for the three MPLS routers so that these mark the packages with MPLS etiquettes. Then when I capture traffic with the ethereal to be able to see the MPLS etiquettes. Please, I would like to know as I must install the software and as it works= . Thanks, I do not have long time. Ra=FAl Gil. |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-04-04 20:18:04
|
Do you want to add new values to the shim? On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:47:31PM +0430, Farazad Farhadzadeh wrote: > Hi all. > I have a question about label in mpls. > I know that label stack is 32-bit value and label is 20-bit value in labe= l=20 > stack ,I want to know that i can decrease this value,for example to 16- > bit. > regards. > -------- > Farzad FarhadZadeh >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-04-04 20:16:27
|
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 08:55:13PM +0200, Jordi wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I have a question. When I will achieve compile quagga-mpls and ldp-portab= le > and it will work correctly, What could do it?. For example, ldp works f= or > create LSP?, the possibility of configure mpls-te in ospf ? >=20 > Thanks for your attention >=20 > Jorge Garc?a=20 >=20 > jo...@sa... OSPF-TE support is independent of ldp-portable. When ldp-portable + quagga-mpls works you will be able to create LDP signaled LSPs (not RSVP-TE) --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-04-04 20:14:56
|
Yes. I suggest learning how to do it with IPv4 traffic first, then adapting to MPLS. Show me the commands you use to achieve your goal with IPv4 and I will modify them to work with MPLS. On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:59:14PM +0200, Jordi wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Can anybody tell me, if is possible map de classified IP traffic (ToS), w= ith > the EXP bits of the shim header of MPLS? >=20 > Thank for your attention. >=20 > Jorge Garc?a >=20 > jo...@sa... >=20 --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: Farazad F. <Far...@sa...> - 2005-04-04 08:19:12
|
Hi all. I have a question about label in mpls. I know that label stack is 32-bit value and label is 20-bit value in label stack ,I want to know that i can decrease this value,for example to 16- bit. regards. -------- Farzad FarhadZadeh |
|
From: Jordi <gio...@ho...> - 2005-04-03 18:55:28
|
Hello, I have a question. When I will achieve compile quagga-mpls and = ldp-portable and it will work correctly, What could do it?. For example, ldp works = for create LSP?, the possibility of configure mpls-te in ospf ? Thanks for your attention Jorge Garc=EDa=20 jo...@sa... |
|
From: Jordi <gio...@ho...> - 2005-04-03 15:00:01
|
Hello, Can anybody tell me, if is possible map de classified IP traffic (ToS), = with the EXP bits of the shim header of MPLS? Thank for your attention. Jorge Garc=EDa jo...@sa... |
|
From: NGOCGL <ngo...@ct...> - 2005-04-01 08:56:43
|
hi all ! I'm a newbie of Linux-Mpls, I just familiar with Cisco-MPLS commands. Where can I found full instruction for linux-mpls commands and examples? thanks. |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-03-31 19:13:41
|
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:23:54AM +0200, Jorge Garc?a wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Anybody knows if ldp-portable implements the RSVP-TE functions? I?ve seen > that in the ldp-portable source code there are a directory named rsvpte, = how > works it? The rsvpte directory was some work I started on, never completed. I would like to implement RSVP-TE on top of my portable LSR core, so that LDP and RSVP-TE could sit side by side and use the same infrastructure. I have the beginings of packet encodes and decodes, nothing more. > Thanks for your attention >=20 > Jorge Garcia >=20 > jo...@sa... >=20 --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-03-31 19:11:56
|
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:53:34AM +0200, Jorge Garc?a wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Anybody knows if the OSPFAPI works correctly in quagga-mpls with > ldp-portable? And, it can also interoperate with ANCS (Active Network > Control Software). I think that it would be interesting for include TE in > MPLS? Hmm. Never been tried. What info would need to move between OSPF and LDP? (maybe /32 routes that have a LSP are assumed to be to a OSPF router id and thus could be considered a forwarding adjacency?) >=20 > Thanks for your attention, >=20 > Jorge Garcia >=20 > jo...@sa... >=20 --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-03-31 15:27:06
|
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:05:18PM +0700, NGOCGL wrote: > hi all ! >=20 > I'm working around with a group that try to devolope a mpls infrastructure > for teaching and researching (http://www.connekgroup.net). >=20 > But I get trouble in the first time I working with MPLS-LINUX, installing > mpls-linux in Fedora Core 3 (2.6.9-1.667). >=20 > You can follow my installing steps to find something wrong. >=20 > 1. I'm installing in Fedora Core 3 (2.6.9-1.667). > 2. I downloaded: > 1. kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2mpls_1_946a.i686.rpm > 2. mpls-linux-1.946a.tar.bz2 > 3. iptables-1.2.11-3.1.FC3mpls1_946.i386.rpm > 4. iproute-2.6.9-3mpls1_946.i386.rpm > 5. ppp-2.4.2-6.4.FC3mpls1_946.i386.rpm > 6. quagga-0.97.3-1.FC3mpls1_946b.i386.rpm >=20 > 3. I setup the rpm files in following steps: > 1. #rpm -Uvh iptables-1.2.11-3.1.FC3mpls1_946.i386.rpm --> OK > 2.# rpm -Uvh iproute-2.6.9-3mpls1_946.i386.rpm -->OK > 3. # rpm -Uvh ppp-2.4.2-6.4.FC3mpls1_946.i386.rpm -->OK > 4. #rpm -Uvh quagga-0.97.3-1.FC3mpls1_946b.i386.rpm -->OK >=20 > 5. #rpm -Uvh kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2mpls_1_946a.i686.rpm -->ERROR > it reports that this kernel is older than current > kernel (same result to rpm -ivh) This reminds, I should make a updated RPM for FC3. But for now just add the --oldpackage tag to the end of you command and it will install. rpm -ivh kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2mpls_1_946a.i686.rpm --oldpackage BTW this is not a 'mpls-linux'-ism this is a general RPM installation issue and could have been solved by looking at the 'rpm' man page. > What are my faults ? where can I have a detail instruction to install > mpls-linux in rpm ? >=20 > thanks. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: > A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. > Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! > http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30 > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: NGOCGL <ngo...@ct...> - 2005-03-31 07:02:07
|
hi all ! I'm working around with a group that try to devolope a mpls infrastructure for teaching and researching (http://www.connekgroup.net). But I get trouble in the first time I working with MPLS-LINUX, installing mpls-linux in Fedora Core 3 (2.6.9-1.667). You can follow my installing steps to find something wrong. 1. I'm installing in Fedora Core 3 (2.6.9-1.667). 2. I downloaded: 1. kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2mpls_1_946a.i686.rpm 2. mpls-linux-1.946a.tar.bz2 3. iptables-1.2.11-3.1.FC3mpls1_946.i386.rpm 4. iproute-2.6.9-3mpls1_946.i386.rpm 5. ppp-2.4.2-6.4.FC3mpls1_946.i386.rpm 6. quagga-0.97.3-1.FC3mpls1_946b.i386.rpm 3. I setup the rpm files in following steps: 1. #rpm -Uvh iptables-1.2.11-3.1.FC3mpls1_946.i386.rpm --> OK 2.# rpm -Uvh iproute-2.6.9-3mpls1_946.i386.rpm -->OK 3. # rpm -Uvh ppp-2.4.2-6.4.FC3mpls1_946.i386.rpm -->OK 4. #rpm -Uvh quagga-0.97.3-1.FC3mpls1_946b.i386.rpm -->OK 5. #rpm -Uvh kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2mpls_1_946a.i686.rpm -->ERROR it reports that this kernel is older than current kernel (same result to rpm -ivh) What are my faults ? where can I have a detail instruction to install mpls-linux in rpm ? thanks. |
|
From: <jo...@sa...> - 2005-03-31 06:50:40
|
Hello, Anybody knows if the OSPFAPI works correctly in quagga-mpls with ldp-portable? And, it can also interoperate with ANCS (Active Network Control Software). I think that it would be interesting for include TE in MPLS? Thanks for your attention, Jorge Garcia jo...@sa... |
|
From: <jo...@sa...> - 2005-03-31 06:21:50
|
Hello, Anybody knows if ldp-portable implements the RSVP-TE functions? I=92ve = seen that in the ldp-portable source code there are a directory named rsvpte, = how works it? =20 Thanks for your attention Jorge Garcia jo...@sa... |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-03-30 16:01:26
|
The last suggestion I have beside upgrading to FC3 it to try and remove the libmikmod related RPMs and see if that helps. On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:06:39AM +0200, Jorge Garc?a ?lvarez wrote: > Hi James, > I have tried to copy aclocal.m4 of quagga in quagga-mpls, and the result > is the same. > I am using Fedora Core 2, > The versions are: > libtool 1.5.6 > libtool-libs 1.5.6-1 > autoconf 2.5.9 > automake 1.9.5 >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Jorge Garcia > jo...@sa... >=20 > > Try copying aclocal.m4 from your quagga source tree into your quagga-mp= ls > > source tree and see what happens. > > > > Also what linux distribution are you using? > > What versions of: > > > > libtool > > libtool-libs > > autoconf > > automake > > > > are you using? > > > > PS please send all mpls-linux related emails to the mpls-linux-general > > mailing list (in this case you should have done a 'reply all' not just > > a 'reply') I've CC'd the list > > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:08:54AM +0200, Jorge Garc?a ?lvarez wrote: > >> hello, > >> I have done it, and my results are: > >> > >> [root@localhost quagga-0.98.2]# ./update-autotools > >> This ./update-autotools script is deprecated, and will be removed at > >> some > >> stage. > >> Please use the 'autoreconf' command included with autoconf. > >> TOOLS VERIONS: > >> autoheader (GNU Autoconf) 2.59 > >> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59 > >> ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.6 (1.1220.2.95 2004/04/11 05:50:42) > >> libtoolize (GNU libtool) 1.5.6 > >> aclocal (GNU automake) 1.9.5 > >> automake (GNU automake) 1.9.5 > >> UPDATING: > >> /usr/share/aclocal/libmikmod.m4:11: warning: underquoted definition of > >> AM_PATH_LIBMIKMOD > >> run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' > >> or see > >> http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal > >> libtoolize: `config.guess' exists: use `--force' to overwrite > >> libtoolize: `config.sub' exists: use `--force' to overwrite > >> libtoolize: `ltmain.sh' exists: use `--force' to overwrite > >> [root@localhost quagga-0.98.2]# > >> > >> what is wrong on quagga-mpls? > >> > >> thanks for your attention > >> > >> Jorge Garcia > >> jo...@sa... > >> > >> > >> > >> > Just as a test, try downloading version 0.98.2 from quagga.net. Unt= ar > >> > it, change into the directory it creates and try and run their > >> > update-autotools and post your results. > >> > > >> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:17:57PM +0100, Jorge Garc?a wrote: > >> >> Sorry I wrote quagga-ldp but I wont to say quagga-mpls. I am > >> compiling > >> >> quagga-mpls. Now you can help me? > >> >> Thanks > >> >> Jorge Garc?a > >> >> jo...@sa... > >> >> -----Mensaje original----- > >> >> De: James R. Leu [mailto:jl...@mi...] > >> >> Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 23 de marzo de 2005 14:53 > >> >> Para: Jorge Garc?a > >> >> CC: mpl...@li... > >> >> Asunto: Re: [mpls-linux-general] ./update-autotools fail > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:58:52AM +0100, Jorge Garc?a wrote: > >> >> > I am trying to comile quagga-ldp ang ldp-portable. I have sync the > >> >> > >> >> I think that might be your problem. You need quagga-mpls not > >> >> quagga-ldp. > >> >> (you are correct in getting ldp-portable as well). > >> >> quagga-ldp was a proof concept tree, it it not longer being > >> developed. > >> >> quagga-mpls has more functionality anyway (it just doesn't work yet, > >> >> that > >> >> is all :-) > >> >> > >> >> > latest code of P4. > >> >> > I have followed the step to compile. First i've created de links > >> and > >> >> > when i do update-autotools I view this fail. What is wrong? > >> >> > > >> >> > root@localhost quagga-mpls]# ./update-autotools > >> >> > This ./update-autotools script is deprecated, and will be removed > >> at > >> >> > some stage.Please use the 'autoreconf' command included with > >> autoconf. > >> >> > TOOLS VERIONS: > >> >> > autoheader (GNU Autoconf) 2.59 > >> >> > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59 > >> >> > ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.6 (1.1220.2.95 2004/04/11 05:50:42) > >> >> > libtoolize (GNU libtool) 1.5.6 > >> >> > aclocal (GNU automake) 1.8.3 > >> >> > automake (GNU automake) 1.8.3 > >> >> > UPDATING: > >> >> > /usr/share/aclocal/libmikmod.m4:11: warning: underquoted definiti= on > >> of > >> >> > AM_PATH_LIBMIKMOD > >> >> > run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' > >> >> > or see > >> >> > http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending%20aclo= cal > >> >> > ' is already registered with AC_CONFIG_FILES. > >> >> > autoconf/status.m4:848: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from... > >> >> > configure.ac:1221: the top level > >> >> > autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1 > >> >> > aclocal: autom4te failed with exit status: 1 > >> >> > ' is already registered with AC_CONFIG_FILES. > >> >> > autoconf/status.m4:848: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from... > >> >> > configure.ac:1221: the top level > >> >> > autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1 > >> >> > autoheader: /usr/bin/autom4te failed with exit status: 1 > >> >> > ' is already registered with AC_CONFIG_FILES. > >> >> > autoconf/status.m4:848: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from... > >> >> > configure.ac:1221: the top level > >> >> > autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1 > >> >> > You should add the contents of `/usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4' to > >> >> > `aclocal.m4'. > >> >> > libtoolize: `config.guess' exists: use `--force' to overwrite > >> >> > libtoolize: `config.sub' exists: use `--force' to overwrite > >> >> > libtoolize: `ltmain.sh' exists: use `--force' to overwrite > >> >> > ' is already registered with AC_CONFIG_FILES. > >> >> > autoconf/status.m4:848: AC_CONFIG_FILES is expanded from... > >> >> > configure.ac:1221: the top level > >> >> > autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1 > >> >> > automake: autoconf failed with exit status: 1 > >> >> > [root@localhost quagga-mpls]# > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks for your attention > >> >> > Jorge Garcia > >> >> > jo...@sa... > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application > >> >> Contest > >> >> > Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or > >> >> Smartphones > >> >> > for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter > >> >> today at > >> >> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6882&alloc_id=3D15148&op=3Dclick > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > mpls-linux-general mailing list > >> >> > mpl...@li... > >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> James R. Leu > >> >> jl...@mi... > >> >> > >> > > >> > -- > >> > James R. Leu > >> > jl...@mi... > >> > > >> > > > > -- > > James R. Leu > > jl...@mi... > > >=20 --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-03-29 15:22:18
|
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 02:21:30PM +0530, ram...@wi... wrote: > Hi, >=20 > When a label space is disabled by assigning it to -1,what will happen > when a packet comes with an incoming label respect to that interface. > ILM has entry for this label. A incoming MPLS packet is assigned the labelspace of the interface it arrives on. The labelspace is used as part of the lookup into the ILM. So to answer your question, their cannot be a matching ILM entry because the packet arrived on an interface with labelspace -1. >=20 > Thanks in advance >=20 > Regards, > Ramesh.s >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id=14396&op?k > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-03-29 15:20:23
|
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 09:19:11PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote: > Hi James, >=20 > I think if I can I will try to make these changes. >=20 > But the code for me is big, and there are some data structure I don't und= erstand, for example "struct interface" and "struct ldp_interface". >=20 > What data structures I should dig and understand when I am tracing the so= urce code? >=20 > Does the labelspace finally write to the kernel somewhere? Yes. The zebra daemon does that. I would start by looking at the code in zebra. Specifically mpls_vty.c and mpls_lib.c When the user sets the labelspace via the zebra CLI it sends a message to the ldpd daemon informing it about the new labelspace. ldpd should not be allowed to set the labelspace, it should only accept labelspace messages from zebra. Try digging around a little. If you have difficulty making progress let me know and I'll provide more specific code references. >=20 > Thanks >=20 > Timothy > 2005.03.29 >=20 > ----- Original Message -----=20 > From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > To: "Timothy(???x)" <m9...@cn...> > Cc: <mpl...@li...> > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 12:41 AM > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] May I ask you a questions about labelsp= ace >=20 > Very good point. The ldpd labelspace CLI is cruft leftover from > quagga-ldp. It should be removed. >=20 > The correct place to configure labelspace is in zebra. Ofcourse we > need make sure that setting a labelspace in zebra causes the right mesg > to be sent to ldpd. >=20 > Would you like to try making these changes and send me a patch? >=20 > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 02:47:37PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote: > > Hi James, > >=20 > > May I ask you a questions about labelspace? > >=20 > > What's the different between we config labelspace through zebra CLI and= ldpd CLI? I mean it seems I can config the labelspace through zebra CLI an= d through ldpd CLI? But there should be something different? I am not so su= re, please correct me, thanks. > >=20 > >=20 > > Best Regards > >=20 > > Timothy > > 2005.03.25 > --=20 > James R. Leu > jl...@mi... --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: <m9...@cn...> - 2005-03-29 13:13:00
|
Hi James, I think if I can I will try to make these changes. But the code for me is big, and there are some data structure I don't = understand, for example "struct interface" and "struct ldp_interface". What data structures I should dig and understand when I am tracing the = source code? Does the labelspace finally write to the kernel somewhere? Thanks Timothy 2005.03.29 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> To: "Timothy(???x)" <m9...@cn...> Cc: <mpl...@li...> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 12:41 AM Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] May I ask you a questions about = labelspace Very good point. The ldpd labelspace CLI is cruft leftover from quagga-ldp. It should be removed. The correct place to configure labelspace is in zebra. Ofcourse we need make sure that setting a labelspace in zebra causes the right mesg to be sent to ldpd. Would you like to try making these changes and send me a patch? On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 02:47:37PM +0800, Timothy\(???x\) wrote: > Hi James, >=20 > May I ask you a questions about labelspace? >=20 > What's the different between we config labelspace through zebra CLI = and ldpd CLI? I mean it seems I can config the labelspace through zebra = CLI and through ldpd CLI? But there should be something different? I am = not so sure, please correct me, thanks. >=20 >=20 > Best Regards >=20 > Timothy > 2005.03.25 --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: <ram...@wi...> - 2005-03-29 08:53:31
|
Hi, When a label space is disabled by assigning it to -1,what will happen when a packet comes with an incoming label respect to that interface. ILM has entry for this label. Thanks in advance Regards, Ramesh.s |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-03-28 23:20:37
|
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 12:01:04AM +0200, A fond Sur MPLS wrote: > Thanks for your answer. > In fact I was refering to RFC 2917 I think. I mean, I > would like to emulate a PE router able to use VRF > tables to forward packets and put the correct labels RFC2547bis describes the use of M-BGP to create/convey info about VRFs. This is what people mean when they talk about MPLS L3 VPNs. > on. > I have heard of an implementation of VRF called > linux-vrf, I'd like to know if it works with MPLS > linux. I am the author behind linux-vrf. There is only minor additions needed to make them work together. > I am sorry if that is not clear (I am not an expert in > MPLS and my English is not very good)... > Anyway, thanks for all... >=20 > --- "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> wrote: > > I'm assuming your refering to L3 VPNs based on > > RFC2547bis, if so, the > > answer is no. There is work towards it, but nothing > > usable. > >=20 > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 06:27:08PM +0200, A fond Sur > > MPLS wrote: > > > Hi everybody > > >=20 > > > I have just discovered MPLS Linux and I would like > > to > > > know if it is possible to implement a VPN/IP > > solution > > > in order to make a demonstration of this > > technology. > > >=20 > > > Thanks a lot > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > =09 > > >=20 > > > =09 > > > =09 > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________ > > > D?couvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace > > de stockage pour vos mails !=20 > > > Cr?ez votre Yahoo! Mail sur > > http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/ > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT > > Products from real users. > > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. > > Start reading now. > > > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > > mpl...@li... > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > >=20 > > --=20 > > James R. Leu > > jl...@mi... > >=20 >=20 >=20 > =09 >=20 > =09 > =09 > __________________________________________________________________ > D?couvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos m= ails !=20 > Cr?ez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/ >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2005-03-28 22:49:31
|
I need the following before I can help you any further: I'd like to see the same TCP packet as it moves from L0 to L1 or from L3 to L4. Checked for duplex mismatches. --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: A f. S. M. <afo...@ya...> - 2005-03-28 22:01:12
|
Thanks for your answer. In fact I was refering to RFC 2917 I think. I mean, I would like to emulate a PE router able to use VRF tables to forward packets and put the correct labels on. I have heard of an implementation of VRF called linux-vrf, I'd like to know if it works with MPLS linux. I am sorry if that is not clear (I am not an expert in MPLS and my English is not very good)... Anyway, thanks for all... --- "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> wrote: > I'm assuming your refering to L3 VPNs based on > RFC2547bis, if so, the > answer is no. There is work towards it, but nothing > usable. > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 06:27:08PM +0200, A fond Sur > MPLS wrote: > > Hi everybody > > > > I have just discovered MPLS Linux and I would like > to > > know if it is possible to implement a VPN/IP > solution > > in order to make a demonstration of this > technology. > > > > Thanks a lot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________ > > D?couvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace > de stockage pour vos mails ! > > Cr?ez votre Yahoo! Mail sur > http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT > Products from real users. > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. > Start reading now. > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > mpl...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > -- > James R. Leu > jl...@mi... > __________________________________________________________________ Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/ |
|
From: mu2000 <mu...@gm...> - 2005-03-28 12:24:22
|
Thanks a lot for the detailed setup example. The problem still remains though, namely, A ssh to ulm1, ulm2 ulm3, etc. is Okay. But ulm1 cannot ssh to ulm2, ulm1 cannot ssh to ulm2, ulm2 cannot ssh to ulm3, etc. The same problem occurs whether I have setup the LSP from ulm4 to ulm1 or not. ssh among the A, ulm1, ulm2, ulm3, ulm4 and B has no problem without mpls. Not really crucial to my mpls network. But I still would like to know why this happens. Any hint appreciated. Also the throughput of the mpls network is really slow (a few k in a 10M ethernet, a few M in a 100M ethernet, with mpls debug in all PC turned off), tested with netperf and meansured traffic (tg (a traffic generator) and tcpdump/tcptrace). Thanks a lot for the nice work in any case. morris On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:26:17 -0600, James R. Leu <jl...@mi...> wrote: > > I'm going to add some numbers to the drawing above and then create the > full set of commands that you will need to issue. You should be able to > extrapolate from that. > > 1.1.1.0/24 3.3.1.0/24 3.3.2.0/24 3.3.3.0/24 2.2.2.0/24 > .1 .2 .1 .2 .1 .2 .1 .2 .1 .2 > e1 e2 e1 e2 e1 e2 e1 e2 e1 e2 > L0 L1 L2 L3 L4 > |A|--------|ulm1|--------|ulm2|--------|ulm3|--------|ulm4|--------|B| > -----1000----X-----1100----X-----1200----> > <----2000----X-----2100----X-----2200----- > > 'X' denotes label swap > > A > ----- > ip route add 2.2.2.0/24 via 1.1.1.2 advmss 1400 > > ulm1 > ---- > mpls nhlfe add key 0 instructions push gen 1000 nexthop eth1 ipv4 3.3.1.2 > (key 0x2) > ip route add 2.2.2.0/24 via 3.3.1.2 spec_nh 0x8847 0x2 advmss 1400 > > mpls labelspace add dev eth1 labelspace 0 > mpls ilm add label gen 2000 labelspace 0 > > ulm2 > ---- > mpls labelspace add dev eth2 labelspace 0 > mpls ilm add label gen 1000 labelspace 0 > mpls nhlfe add key 0 instructions push gen 1100 nexthop eth1 ipv4 3.3.2.2 > (key 0x2) > mpls xc add ilm_label gen 1000 ilm_labelspace 0 nhlfe key 0x2 > > mpls labelspace add dev eth1 labelspace 0 > mpls ilm add label gen 2100 labelspace 0 > mpls nhlfe add key 0 instructions push gen 2000 nexthop eth2 ipv4 3.3.1.1 > (key 0x3) > mpls xc add ilm_label gen 2100 ilm_labelspace 0 nhlfe key 0x3 > > ulm3 > ---- > mpls labelspace add dev eth2 labelspace 0 > mpls ilm add label gen 1100 labelspace 0 > mpls nhlfe add key 0 instructions push gen 1200 nexthop eth1 ipv4 3.3.3.2 > (key 0x2) > mpls xc add ilm_label gen 1100 ilm_labelspace 0 nhlfe key 0x2 > > mpls labelspace add dev eth1 labelspace 0 > mpls ilm add label gen 2200 labelspace 0 > mpls nhlfe add key 0 instructions push gen 2100 nexthop eth2 ipv4 3.3.2.1 > (key 0x3) > mpls xc add ilm_label gen 2200 ilm_labelspace 0 nhlfe key 0x3 > > ulm4 > ---- > mpls labelspace add dev eth2 labelspace 0 > mpls ilm add label gen 1200 labelspace 0 > > mpls nhlfe add key 0 instructions push gen 2200 nexthop eth2 ipv4 3.3.3.1 > (key 0x3) > ip route add 1.1.1.0/24 via 3.3.3.1 spec_nh 0x8847 0x3 advmss 1400 > > B > ----- > ip route add 1.1.1.0/24 via 2.2.2.1 advmss 1400 > > If you have ethernet cards which can support jumbo frames then you can > remove the advmss part and increase the MTU on L1,L2,L3 to 9000 > > Note that I did not add any routes IP routes to ulm2 or ulm3, and only > the 1.1.1.0/24 and 2.2.2.0/24 routes to ulm4 and ulm1 (respectivly). > > > I'll try to capture the normal traffic and send it the list. > > Just make sure you don't waste time, I'd like to see that same packet as > is moves from L0 to L1 or from L3 to L4. > > > > > Thanks, > > morris > > > > > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:36:46 -0600, James R. Leu <jl...@mi...> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 12:21:17PM +0800, mu w wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks for taking the time to reply, James. > > > > > > Are you using TCP offload cards? Did you compiling your own kernel > > > or did you use an RPM? > > > > > > > Yes I can ssh to ulm3 when MPLS is not enabled. The MTU between ulm2 and > > > > ulm3 are 1500 (showed by `ip link or ip add`) and 1494 shown by `mpls > > > > nhlfe show`. The set up commands for mpls: > > > > > > Try setting the advmss on the routes for you ingress/egress. > > > How are you setting up the routes on ingress egress? > > > > > > > > > > > outgoing labels on bother interfaces: mpls nhlfe add key/ mpls nhlfe > > > > change key KEY_PREVIOUSLY_GENERATED ... > > > > incoming labels on both interfaces: mpls labelspace add dev DEV > > > > labelspace 0/mpls ilm add label gen LABEL(match with incoming label) > > > > labelspace 0 > > > > (Do I need to use xc? > > > > But ping works Okay, all request and reply are mpls enabled -- I see the > > > > mpls bits in ethereal and tcpdump) > > > > > > Are any of your devices just a LSR, ie it should only see labeled packets? > > > If so then yes, otherwise no :-) > > > > > > > If I use 'telnet ulm3 22', I see the initial response: > > > > Connected to 192.168.25.1. > > > > Escape character is '^]'. > > > > SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 > > > > > > > > I have done some more testing with ethereal and tcpdump. In one of the > > > > ethereal outputs, I can see the three-way handshake is complete, > > > > then ulm3 three sends a [SYN, FIN, ACK, CWR] to ulm1. The ethereal > > > > says "Header length: 16 bytes (bogus, must be at least 20)" shown below: > > > > > > Can you capture the same packet on the IP only link and then the > > > MPLS link and do a full HEX dump of it and send it to the mailing list? > > > > > > > [frames 2,3,4, threeway handshake, no problem] > > > > Frame 5 (95 bytes on wire, 95 bytes captured) > > > > Ethernet II, Src: 00:02:44:6a:ff:f8, Dst: 00:50:04:c3:7a:40 > > > > MultiProtocol Label Switching Header > > > > Internet Protocol, Src Addr: 192.168.13.2 (192.168.13.2), Dst Addr: > > > > 192.168.25.1 (192.168.25.1) > > > > Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: ssh (22), Dst Port: 1139 > > > > (1139), Seq: 0 > > > > Source port: ssh (22) > > > > Destination port: 1139 (1139) > > > > Sequence number: 0 > > > > Header length: 16 bytes (bogus, must be at least 20) > > > > > > > > Frame 6 (95 bytes on wire, 95 bytes captured) > > > > Ethernet II, Src: 00:02:44:6a:ff:f8, Dst: 00:50:04:c3:7a:40 > > > > MultiProtocol Label Switching Header > > > > Internet Protocol, Src Addr: 192.168.13.2 (192.168.13.2), Dst Addr: > > > > 192.168.25.1 (192.168.25.1) > > > > Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: ssh (22), Dst Port: 1139 > > > > (1139), Seq: 0 > > > > Source port: ssh (22) > > > > Destination port: 1139 (1139) > > > > Sequence number: 0 > > > > Header length: 16 bytes (bogus, must be at least 20) > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > From some tcpdump output, it looks like the checksum sometimes goes bad > > > > -- "bad tcp checksum a792 (->59c2)!" in the following tcpdump output. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > morris > > > > > > > > `tcp -xvp -i eth0` output > > > > > > > > 11:47:32.828060 MPLS (label 25, exp 0, [S], ttl 64) > > > > IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 45153, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 6, > > > > length: 60) 192.168.25.1.1138 > 192.168.13.1.ssh: S [tcp sum ok] > > > > 3559799760:3559799760(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 89820081 > > > > 0,nop,wscale 2> > > > > 0x0000: 0001 9140 4500 003c b061 4000 4006 e307 ...@E..<.a@.@... > > > > 0x0010: c0a8 1901 c0a8 0d01 0472 0016 d42e 3bd0 .........r....;. > > > > 0x0020: 0000 0000 a002 16d0 e44f 0000 0204 05b4 .........O...... > > > > 0x0030: 0402 080a 055a 8bb1 0000 0000 0103 0302 .....Z.......... > > > > 11:47:32.828813 MPLS (label 125, exp 0, [S], ttl 64) > > > > IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 6, > > > > length: 60) 192.168.13.1.ssh > 192.168.25.1.1138: S [tcp sum ok] > > > > 2832248515:2832248515(0) ack 3559799761 win 5792 <mss > > > > 1460,sackOK,timestamp 153217841 89820081,nop,wscale 2> > > > > 0x0000: 0007 d140 4500 003c 0000 4000 4006 9369 ...@E..<..@.@..i > > > > 0x0010: c0a8 0d01 c0a8 1901 0016 0472 a8d0 aec3 ...........r.... > > > > 0x0020: d42e 3bd1 a012 16a0 9887 0000 0204 05b4 ..;............. > > > > 0x0030: 0402 080a 0921 eb31 055a 8bb1 0103 0302 .....!.1.Z...... > > > > 11:47:32.829452 MPLS (label 25, exp 0, [S], ttl 64) > > > > IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 45155, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 6, > > > > length: 52) 192.168.25.1.1138 > 192.168.13.1.ssh: . [tcp sum ok] ack 1 > > > > win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 89820083 153217841> > > > > 0x0000: 0001 9140 4500 0034 b063 4000 4006 e30d ...@E..4.c@.@... > > > > 0x0010: c0a8 1901 c0a8 0d01 0472 0016 d42e 3bd1 .........r....;. > > > > 0x0020: a8d0 aec4 8010 05b4 d838 0000 0101 080a .........8...... > > > > 0x0030: 055a 8bb3 0921 eb31 .Z...!.1 > > > > 11:47:32.832443 MPLS (label 125, exp 0, [S], ttl 64) > > > > IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 17910, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 6, > > > > length: 77) 192.168.13.1.ssh > 192.168.25.1.1138: FE [bad tcp cksum a792 > > > > (->59c2)!] 1:34(33) ack 1 win 1448 urg 0 <nop,nop,[bad opt]> > > > > 0x0000: 0007 d140 4500 004d 45f6 4000 4006 4d62 ...@E..ME.@.@.Mb > > > > 0x0010: c0a8 0d01 c0a8 1901 0016 0472 a8d0 aec4 ...........r.... > > > > 0x0020: d42e 3bd1 6371 05a8 a792 0000 0101 080a ..;.cq.......... > > > > 0x0030: 0921 eb34 055a 8bb3 5353 482d 312e 3939 .!.4.Z..SSH-1.99 > > > > 0x0040: 2d4f 7065 6e53 5348 5f33 2e36 2e31 7032 -OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 > > > > 0x0050: 0a > > > > 11:47:33.033583 MPLS (label 125, exp 0, [S], ttl 64) > > > > IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 17912, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 6, > > > > length: 77) 192.168.13.1.ssh > 192.168.25.1.1138: SFRW [bad tcp cksum > > > > a792 (->59c2)!] 2832248516:2832248549(33) win 1448 urg 0 <nop,nop,[bad opt]> > > > > 0x0000: 0007 d140 4500 004d 45f8 4000 4006 4d60 ...@E..ME.@.@.M` > > > > 0x0010: c0a8 0d01 c0a8 1901 0016 0472 a8d0 aec4 ...........r.... > > > > 0x0020: d42e 3bd1 62a7 05a8 a792 0000 0101 080a ..;.b........... > > > > 0x0030: 0921 ebfe 055a 8bb3 5353 482d 312e 3939 .!...Z..SSH-1.99 > > > > 0x0040: 2d4f 7065 6e53 5348 5f33 2e36 2e31 7032 -OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 > > > > 0x0050: 0a . > > > > 11:47:33.435402 MPLS (label 125, exp 0, [S], ttl 64) > > > > IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 17914, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 6, > > > > length: 77) 192.168.13.1.ssh > 192.168.25.1.1138: FR [bad tcp cksum a792 > > > > (->59c2)!] 1:34(33) ack 1 win 1448 <nop,nop,[bad opt]> > > > > 0x0000: 0007 d140 4500 004d 45fa 4000 4006 4d5e ...@E..ME.@.@.M^ > > > > 0x0010: c0a8 0d01 c0a8 1901 0016 0472 a8d0 aec4 ...........r.... > > > > 0x0020: d42e 3bd1 6115 05a8 a792 0000 0101 080a ..;.a........... > > > > 0x0030: 0921 ed90 055a 8bb3 5353 482d 312e 3939 .!...Z..SSH-1.99 > > > > 0x0040: 2d4f 7065 6e53 5348 5f33 2e36 2e31 7032 -OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 > > > > 0x0050: 0a . > > > > 11:47:34.239254 MPLS (label 125, exp 0, [S], ttl 64) > > > > IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 17916, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 6, > > > > length: 77) 192.168.13.1.ssh > 192.168.25.1.1138: FWE [bad tcp cksum > > > > a792 (->59c2)!] 1:38(37) ack 1 win 1448 urg 0 > > > > 0x0000: 0007 d140 4500 004d 45fc 4000 4006 4d5c ...@E..ME.@.@.M\ > > > > 0x0010: c0a8 0d01 c0a8 1901 0016 0472 a8d0 aec4 ...........r.... > > > > 0x0020: d42e 3bd1 5df1 05a8 a792 0000 0101 080a ..;.]........... > > > > 0x0030: 0921 f0b4 055a 8bb3 5353 482d 312e 3939 .!...Z..SSH-1.99 > > > > 0x0040: 2d4f 7065 6e53 5348 5f33 2e36 2e31 7032 -OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 > > > > 0x0050: 0a . > > > > 11:47:35.669679 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 58574, offset 0, flags [none], > > > > proto 89, length: 68) 192.168.25.2 > OSPF-ALL.MCAST.NET: OSPFv2, Hello > > > > (1), length: 48 > > > > Router-ID: 192.168.25.2, Area 0.0.0.100, Authentication Type: > > > > none (0) > > > > Options: [External] > > > > Hello Timer: 10s, Dead Timer 40s, Mask: 255.255.255.0, Priority: 1 > > > > Designated Router 192.168.25.2, Backup Designated Router > > > > 192.168.25.1 > > > > Neighbor List: > > > > 192.168.88.2 > > > > 0x0000: 45c0 0044 e4ce 0000 0159 1a23 c0a8 1902 E..D.....Y.#.... > > > > 0x0010: e000 0005 0201 0030 c0a8 1902 0000 0064 .......0.......d > > > > 0x0020: 568c 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ffff ff00 V............... > > > > 0x0030: 000a 0201 0000 0028 c0a8 1902 c0a8 1901 .......(........ > > > > 0x0040: c0a8 5802 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ======================================= > > > > From: James R. Leu <jleu@mi...> > > > > * Re: help: how to ssh to mpls machine?* > > > > <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=11144914> > > > > 2005-03-12 17:43 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you ssh to the machine in question when MPLS is not enabled > > > > in the network? What are the exact commands you issuesd on all of machines > > > > in your diagram? What is the MTU of the link between ulm2 and ulm3? > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 12:39:22AM +0800, mu w wrote: > > > > > (ssh to non-mpls machines via mpls net works) -- one more time > > > > > > > > > > OK the previous email didn"t get through...please forgive me for > > > > reposting. > > > > > > > > > > Hi James and all... > > > > > > > > > > I built an mpls network using static label switched path, by using mpls > > > > > nhlfe...and mpls ilm...etc (in 2.6.9-1.6_FC2mpls_1_946). Everything > > > > > works fine except I cannot ssh to an mpls machine. > > > > > The following figure show my network > > > > > > > > > > ulm1--ulm2---ulm3----ulm4 > > > > > > > > > > ulm2 and ulm3 are the mpls network, ulm1 and ulm4 are normal IP hosts. > > > > > ulm1 can ssh to ulm4 (traffic on ulm2 and ulm3 are labeled) but cannot > > > > > ssh to ulm3. ping to ulm3 is okay. > > > > > > > > > > Ethereal shows the mpls traffic for ssh handshake...SYN and stuff but > > > > > the connection was reset after a while. > > > > > > > > > > Is ssh to ulm3 possible? If yes how to setup? > > > > > > > > > > I have seen question on ftp and ssh questions in the archive but can"t > > > > > find any answers. Any help and pointer are appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > Also, is there a more detailed manual for the mpls command in (uname -a > > > > > = 2.6.9-1.6_FC2mpls_1_946)? > > > > > > > > Not written yet, but you can issue "mpls help" and it will give you > > > > command line syntax. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > > > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > > > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > > > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > > > mpl...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > > > > > -- > > > James R. Leu > > > jl...@mi... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > mpl...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > -- > James R. Leu > jl...@mi... > > > |
533 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
