mpls-linux-general Mailing List for MPLS for Linux (Page 139)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
Menu
▾
▴
mpls-linux-general — Mailing list for general discussion about MPLS for Linux
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(26) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(71) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(123) |
Mar
(67) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(75) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(79) |
Oct
(85) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(39) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(74) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(105) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(91) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(62) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(63) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
|
From: farahmand z. <z_c...@ya...> - 2002-05-09 10:14:02
|
Hi jim n all,
I really need your help , my ldp-portable doesn't work properly and I don't know what is wrong?!
I have redhat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.13 (MPLS patched).I got the latest ldp-portable via CVS ,first, I have a simple question:I compiled ldp-portable in directory ldp-portable by typing "make ldp_linux" and it was compiled successfully,is it compiled with MPLS_LINUX ?How can I make sure?(The first line in the Makefile in directory ldp-portable:CFLAGS = -g -I. -wall -D__LDP_LINUX__ -Werror
#-DMPLS_LINUX).
I have configured 2 machines as follows :
lo 10.0.0.1 lo 10.0.0.2
---------- -----------
| A |------------------------------| B |
---------- -----------
.206 | 192.168.2.0/24 .207|
------------------------------------------------------------
PC B:
bash# ip addr add 10.0.0.2/32 dev lo
bash#ip route add 10.0.0.1/32 via 192.168.2.206
routing table in PC B:
Des Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Interface
10.0.0.1 sunrise 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default itrcprox3.itrc 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
./mplsadm -L eth0:0
prompt> add global 10.0.0.2
ENTER : ##args##
EXIT : ##args##
ENTER : ##args##
EXIT : ##args##
ENTER : ##args##
ENTER : ##args##
Adding interface lo
Adding interface eth0
Adding route 0a000001/32 via 2
Adding route c0a80200/24 via 2
Adding route 7f000000/8 via 1
Adding route 00000000/0 via 2
Adding route 0a000002/32 via 1
EXIT : ##args##
EXIT : ##args##
ENTER : ##args##
EXIT : ##args##
Adding global object with LSRID 0a000002
prompt>set trace 0xffffffff
Set tracing flag to ffffffff
prompt>add interface eth0
Adding interface eth0
prompt>show session
2 c0a802ce 45 5
prompt>show database
1 0a000001/32 2 via2
2 0a000002/32 3 via2
3 7f000000/8 3 via2
4 c0a80200/24 3 via2
5 7f000000/8 2 via2
6 c0a80200/24 2 via2
prompt>show route
0a000001/32 via c0a802ce:2
0a000002/32 via 00000000:1
7f000000/8 via 00000000:1
c0a80200/24 via 00000000:2
00000000/0 via c0a80201:2
prompt>show interface
2 eth0
I can see HELLO,INIT,KEEP ALIVE,ADDRESS,LABEL MAPPING messages,but all files in /proc/net/mpls_*
are empty.
Any help from you are greately appriciated.I'm waiting to hear from you and thank you inadvance.
Best Regards,
Zahra Farahmand.
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Mother's Day is May 12th! |
|
From: Hariharan K. <hku...@ho...> - 2002-05-07 15:59:11
|
Hi, I tried the ldp-portable from CVS and it worked fine.No Warnings... The "/proc/net/mpls_out" file is not getting populated. We have a network like this, Host A - Router B (Linux) (Cisco) The label entries from Host A are available on the Router. The label entries in the Router are not getting propogated to the Linux box. The /proc/net/mpls_out is empty. Will the ldp process populate the /proc/net/mpls_out file ? Am I missing something here. Any help on this will be highly appreciated. Thanks, Hari. >From: "Hariharan Kunchithaptham" To: >mpl...@li... Subject: [mpls-linux-general] (no >subject) Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 23:33:24 +0530 > _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx |
|
From: <xia...@no...> - 2002-05-07 13:02:02
|
Hi, there! Is this MPLS-linux IP version 6 compatible? I couldn't find document or email discussion on this topic. If it is not yet IPv6 OK, any schedule to make it so? Thanks! -- Ben |
|
From: Hariharan K. <hku...@ho...> - 2002-05-06 18:03:41
|
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>Hi , </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>We have patched the kernel for MPLS.
<DIV></DIV>The ldp-poprtable compiles with warnings(runs to one page...),but the ldp_linux gets created succesfully.
<DIV></DIV>{ Note : The Makefile in port directory has -DMPLS_LINUX enabled)
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>The warnings generated during compilation of ldp_linux. <BR>Is this a known problem ?
<P> Also does the ldp-portable update the <STRONG>proc/net/mpls_* </STRONG>directories.... <BR>The ldp portable code does not contain any code-refernce to the proc directories. </P>Or am i missing something ?
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>Any help will be greatly appreciated. </P>Thanks,
<DIV></DIV>Hari.</div><br clear=all><hr>MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: <a href='http://g.msn.com/1HM103401/39'>Click Here</a><br></html>
|
|
From: Jack f <jf...@ho...> - 2002-05-06 06:37:00
|
Hi, can anyone help me with this problem. I'm trying to send MPLS packet between two host using two ATM NICs back to back. ATM NICs: Forerunner 200 series Linux kernel 2.4.12 ATM on Linux 2.4.0 host1: atmsigd -b -m network atmarpd -b atmarp -c atm0 ifconfig atm0 192.168.1.1 up ./mplsadm -A -O atm:0/33:atm0 host2: atmsigd -b atmarpd -b atmarp -c atm0 ifconfig atm0 192.168.1.2 up ./mplsadm -L atm0:3 ./mplsadm -A -I atm:0/33:3 I check the file at /proc/net/mpls_* there were no outgoing label entry created on host 1. The incoming label entry on host 2 is there but the outgoing label entry on host 1 is not. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong. I also try to add a PVC using the following host1: atmarp -s 192.168.1.2 0.0.70 host2: atmarp -s 192.168.1.1 0.0.70 but still have the same problem The following is from the /var/log/messages kernel: mpls_add_out_label: enter kernel: mpls_make_dst: enter kernel: mpls_make_dst: before bind neighbor kernel: mpls_make_dst: bind neighbor failed kernel: mpls_make_dst: exit(00000000) kernel: mpls_add_out_label: mpls_make_dst failed kernel: __mpls_del_out_label: enter kernel: __mpls_del_out_label: exit kernel: mpls_add_out_label: exit Thank you for your help Jack _________________________________________________________________ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com |
|
From: Kiyoung J. <jj...@ic...> - 2002-05-06 02:08:42
|
Hi, all. I want to identify the inlabel with input port information in ldp-linux. In the case of outpot, outlabel structure have the related information. But inlabel have no information directly, I think. In the case of no information of input port in inlabel, only just label merging is supported. But sometimes same inlabels with different inputs port should be treated differently. That is the case of GMPLS. Is there anyone care about this problem? I'm looking at the session information in inlabel structure. But it is difficult for me to get the wanted field from the session pointer. Regards. ---------------------------------------------------- Kiyoung Jung (jj...@ic...) Information and Communications University(ICU) Broadband Network Laboratory (http://bnlab.icu.ac.kr) 58-4 Hwaam-dong, Yusong-gu, Taejon, 305-732, KOREA Tel)+82-42-866-6172, 016-370-1751 Fax)+82-42-866-6110 |
|
From: farahmand z. <z_c...@ya...> - 2002-05-05 10:52:32
|
Hi jim n all, to grab the latest version of ldp-portable,I used "ldp-portable" with no revision ,insteed of modulename,and it was done, and now I have a directory named "/ldp-portable", but I don't know,is it sufficient or not? Thank you in advance. Z.Farah __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com |
|
From: farahmand z. <z_c...@ya...> - 2002-05-05 08:37:14
|
Hi jim n thank you for your response,
I grab the latest ldp-portable via CVS(it doesn't have
revision,I entered ldp-portable in modulename).
I changed directory to ldp-portable and typed "make
ldp_linux".it compiled successfully.I ran it like last
time,this time I saw LABEL MAPPING message and ADDRESS
message once at first,when I do "show session" a
line is displayed,and when I do "show databese" two
lines are displayed,but the files in /proc/net/mpls_*
are empty except mpls_labelspace n mpls_in at host A.
When I do "set trace 0xffffffff",I can see this
message in the monitor:
ldp_event: LDP_EVENT_TCP_DATA eror = 11
in addition:
UDP data size = 0
TP data size = -1
What do they meant?,
In addition when I do "add route 192.168.2.0/32
192.168.2.206",TCP data size changes to some value(I
think 34 and then 22),then LABEL REQUEST message is
appeared and then NOTIFICATION message is appeared and
the programe aborts:
ldp_linux : ldp-fec.c:374:fec-tlv2ldp_fec:assertion
'0' failed.
Do you know about it?
I really need your response.
Thanks in advance.
Z.Farah
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com
|
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-04 17:14:55
|
Get the latest version of ldp-portable via CVS and you will get README.cli. On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 03:16:52AM +0900, YoungHyun-Baek wrote: > someone said that there is a documentation about ldp-portable in "ldp- > portable/linux-port/README.cli". >=20 > but I can't find it in my ldp-portable soure(ldp-portable-0.060\port)=20 > where is it ? >=20 >=20 >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > =B9=E9=BF=B5=C7=F6(=DB=DC=E7=B5=FA=E7) Baek, Younghyun > Broadband Network Laboratory (BNLAB) > Division of Information & Communication Universitty > 58-4 Hwa Ahm Dong, Yusong, Taejon Korea 305-732=20 > Tel:+82-42-866-6182,016-322-8523 > Fax) +82-42-866-6110 > home)http://vega.icu.ac.kr/~yhbaek > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 > =20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________________________ >=20 > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We sup= ply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: bandwidth@sourceforge.= net > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-04 17:11:03
|
Get the latest ldp-portable via CVS 0.060 is old. Make sure to compile with MPLS_LINUX defined in the makefile. Turn on trace before adding the interface. Use show commands to verify that you have an adj and to see what entries are in the database. Jim On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 07:05:19AM -0700, farahmand zahra wrote: > Hi jim n all, > I have ldp-prtable-0.060 & mpls-linux-1.0 on my > computers,I compiled ldp-prtable successfully,but when > I run it,it doesn't work properly.I did steps at > below, > ---------------------------- > on host A: > #ifconfig eth0 192.168.2.207 netmask 255.255.255.0 up > #ifconfig eth0 allmulti > #route add 192.168.2.206/32 gw 192.168.2.206 > ./mplsadm -L eth0:0 > prompt>add global 192.168.2.207 > prompt>add interface eth0 > ---------------------------- > on host B: > #ifconfig eth0 192.168.2.206 netmask 255.255.255.0 up > #ifconfig eth0 allmulti > #route add 192.168.2.207/32 gw 192.168.2.207 > ./mplsadm -L eth0:0 > prompt>add global 192.168.2.206 > prompt>add interface eth0 > ----------------------------- > When I do "add interface eth0" at host B,this message > is appeared: > prompt>PRT : ldp_state_recv_init: cannot find adj > index: 3 c0a802cf/32 2 > and at host A this message is appeared: > index: 1 c0a802ce/32 2 > What are they meant? > in addition ,only HELLO n KEEP ALIVE messages are > displayed when I do "set trace 0xffffffff". > and the files in the /proc/net/mpls_* are empty except > mpls_labelspace n mpls_in in host A. > (I can ping host A n B from each other) > I don't know what is wrong?!,and I really need your > help. > Thanks in advance and waiting for your reply. > Z.Farah > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness > http://health.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: farahmand z. <z_c...@ya...> - 2002-05-04 14:05:19
|
Hi jim n all,
I have ldp-prtable-0.060 & mpls-linux-1.0 on my
computers,I compiled ldp-prtable successfully,but when
I run it,it doesn't work properly.I did steps at
below,
----------------------------
on host A:
#ifconfig eth0 192.168.2.207 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
#ifconfig eth0 allmulti
#route add 192.168.2.206/32 gw 192.168.2.206
./mplsadm -L eth0:0
prompt>add global 192.168.2.207
prompt>add interface eth0
----------------------------
on host B:
#ifconfig eth0 192.168.2.206 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
#ifconfig eth0 allmulti
#route add 192.168.2.207/32 gw 192.168.2.207
./mplsadm -L eth0:0
prompt>add global 192.168.2.206
prompt>add interface eth0
-----------------------------
When I do "add interface eth0" at host B,this message
is appeared:
prompt>PRT : ldp_state_recv_init: cannot find adj
index: 3 c0a802cf/32 2
and at host A this message is appeared:
index: 1 c0a802ce/32 2
What are they meant?
in addition ,only HELLO n KEEP ALIVE messages are
displayed when I do "set trace 0xffffffff".
and the files in the /proc/net/mpls_* are empty except
mpls_labelspace n mpls_in in host A.
(I can ping host A n B from each other)
I don't know what is wrong?!,and I really need your
help.
Thanks in advance and waiting for your reply.
Z.Farah
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com
|
|
From: YoungHyun-Baek <yh...@ic...> - 2002-05-03 18:16:31
|
someone said that there is a documentation about ldp-portable in "ldp- portable/linux-port/README.cli". but I can't find it in my ldp-portable soure(ldp-portable-0.060\port)=20 where is it ? =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =B9=E9=BF=B5=C7=F6(=DB=DC=E7=B5=FA=E7) Baek, Younghyun Broadband Network Laboratory (BNLAB) Division of Information & Communication Universitty 58-4 Hwa Ahm Dong, Yusong, Taejon Korea 305-732=20 Tel:+82-42-866-6182,016-322-8523 Fax) +82-42-866-6110 home)http://vega.icu.ac.kr/~yhbaek =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =20 =20 |
|
From: Javier S. L. <sj...@te...> - 2002-05-03 13:19:06
|
I got this problem solved doing "make clean" and recompiling ldp then. Hope this helps Javier Sanchez Llera sj...@te... El Vie 03 May 2002 07:37, pingping han escribió: > When I was compiling the ldp-protable, it occured the following error: > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >------------------------ > > /usr/bin/ld: port/ldp_linux.o: Relocation in generic ELF (EM:2) > > port/ldp_linux.o: could not read symbols: File in wrong format > > collected 2: ld returned 1 exit status > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >------------------------- > > I dont know why? :-( > > what conditons will it need when compiling ldp_linux? > > gcc version? or other ? > > Thanks > > Aileen Han ^o^ > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Do You Yahoo!? > µœÑÅ»¢µ÷²éÖÐÐÄ·¢±íÄúµÄÒâŒû¡£ |
|
From: <han...@ya...> - 2002-05-03 05:37:48
|
When I was compiling the ldp-protable, it occured the following error: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/bin/ld: port/ldp_linux.o: Relocation in generic ELF (EM:2) port/ldp_linux.o: could not read symbols: File in wrong format collected 2: ld returned 1 exit status ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I dont know why? :-( what conditons will it need when compiling ldp_linux? gcc version? or other ? Thanks Aileen Han ^o^ --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? 到雅虎调查中心发表您的意见。 |
|
From: Hariharan K. <hku...@ho...> - 2002-05-03 04:12:17
|
Hi Jim, After doing a make install , the MPLS was enabled.We were are earlier using make bzLilo. Is there any problem with make bzLilo , Just curious :) Thanks for your help. Have a great weekend Hari. >From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> >Reply-To: jl...@mi... >To: Hariharan Kunchithaptham <hku...@ho...> >CC: mpl...@li... >Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] MPLS on Linux Enabled or Not ? >Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 12:57:37 -0500 > >How did you install the kernel? 'make install'? 'make bzlilo'? >What distribution are you using RedHat? If so use 'make install' to >install >your kernel (make user to make your modules and install them as well) > >Jim > > >On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:19:59PM +0530, Hariharan Kunchithaptham wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am running a Linux-2.4.9 kernel,patched with MPLS (0.996). > > All the necessary config options were enabled.The patch went thro fine. > > > > I found that the "dmesg" does not contain any MPLS info > > , and the "/proc/net/mpls_*" directory is not available. > > > > I am not able to verify if the MPLS is enabled in the kernel. > > > > Any help will be highly appreciated. > > > > TIA, > > Hari. > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > > > >-- >James R. Leu _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com |
|
From: Jack f <jf...@ho...> - 2002-05-03 01:10:48
|
Hi, I'm new to MPLS. I was wondering when implementing MPLS over ATM, where is the MPLS header, in the VPI/VCI or just the VCI field of the ATM header? If it's just using the VCI field, ATM should still be able to forward the packet with just the VPI field right? Thanks Jack _________________________________________________________________ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com |
|
From: Alexander S. <sa...@cc...> - 2002-05-02 15:46:33
|
Hi I use mpls-linux-1.0 and ldp-portable-0.060 I have two hosts connected to the same subnetwork which make use of LDP. = After I issue > add global ... > add interface ... commands the exchange of labels occur (I can see it with network = analyzer) but one of the hosts do not ALWAYS build LSP properly. So, = from host A to host B all packets come with labels, but in the opposite = direction they come without them. ldp_linux on the host A outputs FEC: .... and on the host B it outputs index: .... Explicit > add route ... command on host B helps but sometimes ldp_linux crashes. By the way, what do the following messages mean which I use to see in = ldp_linux output ?=20 PRT: ldp_state_recv_init: cannot find adj PRT: Gratuitous search !! Another problem is the following. Suppose I have only one network = interface (eth0). If I issue the following command > add interface eth4 the ldp_linux will report an error but somehow add this interface (it is = possible to check it with show interfaces). If I issue then > del interface appropriate_number the ldp_linux will crash Quite often the whole system crashes when I exit from ldp_linux.=20 Sincerely, Sayenko Alex |
|
From: Javier S. L. <sj...@te...> - 2002-05-02 09:02:45
|
Did you select mpls options to be compiled inside the kernel or as modules ???? Maybe you need to do a insmod ??? Anyway did you use make modules ; make modules_install ??? at leats that what i need to do on my debian to get the modules working. You can take a look too at /lib/modules/2.4.9/ if you find there anu mpls modules you should do an insmod to get the things run Hope this helps Javier Sanchez Llera sj...@te... El Mié 01 May 2002 19:57, James R. Leu escribió: > How did you install the kernel? 'make install'? 'make bzlilo'? > What distribution are you using RedHat? If so use 'make install' to > install your kernel (make user to make your modules and install them as > well) > > Jim > > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:19:59PM +0530, Hariharan Kunchithaptham wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am running a Linux-2.4.9 kernel,patched with MPLS (0.996). > > All the necessary config options were enabled.The patch went thro fine. > > > > I found that the "dmesg" does not contain any MPLS info > > , and the "/proc/net/mpls_*" directory is not available. > > > > I am not able to verify if the MPLS is enabled in the kernel. > > > > Any help will be highly appreciated. > > > > TIA, > > Hari. > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-01 16:11:47
|
How did you install the kernel? 'make install'? 'make bzlilo'? What distribution are you using RedHat? If so use 'make install' to install your kernel (make user to make your modules and install them as well) Jim On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:19:59PM +0530, Hariharan Kunchithaptham wrote: > Hi, > > I am running a Linux-2.4.9 kernel,patched with MPLS (0.996). > All the necessary config options were enabled.The patch went thro fine. > > I found that the "dmesg" does not contain any MPLS info > , and the "/proc/net/mpls_*" directory is not available. > > I am not able to verify if the MPLS is enabled in the kernel. > > Any help will be highly appreciated. > > TIA, > Hari. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > -- James R. Leu |
|
From: Hariharan K. <hku...@ho...> - 2002-05-01 15:50:18
|
Hi, I am running a Linux-2.4.9 kernel,patched with MPLS (0.996). All the necessary config options were enabled.The patch went thro fine. I found that the "dmesg" does not contain any MPLS info , and the "/proc/net/mpls_*" directory is not available. I am not able to verify if the MPLS is enabled in the kernel. Any help will be highly appreciated. TIA, Hari. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. |
|
From: farahmand z. <z_c...@ya...> - 2002-05-01 11:44:19
|
Hi all, i tried a below combination: ------- eth0 eth0 --------- : 1 :-----------------------: 2 : ------- .206 .207 -------- all ip 192.168.2.* I can ping betweenm the boxes.and I enabled Multicast on the interfaces and I did these steps: on node 1: ifconfig eth0 192.168.2.206 netmask 255.255.255.0 up ip addr add 192.168.2.206/32 dev eth0 ip route add 192.168.2.207/32 dev eth0 ./mplsadm -L eth0:0 ./mplsadm -d ./ldp_linux prompt>add global 192.168.2.206 prompt>add interface eth0 prompt>add route 192.168.2.207 dev eth0 and I repeated these steps in node 2,but when I set trace, only HELLO message is observed and no other messages are found.and when I do "show session",the response is "no session is established".in addition when I do "show route" no route is displayed. I think boxes don't have destination address of each other,but I don't know what must I do!? Can you help me,I really need your help. Thanks in advance Best Regards, Z.Farahmand __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com |
|
From: farahmand z. <z_c...@ya...> - 2002-04-29 07:49:00
|
Hi Jim
Thanks in advance for your reply,I did a allmulti,but computers still send Hello messages,I think maybe they can't find each other in the network,when I ping from A to B and vice versa, no error is occured but I'm not sure that ping is done succesfully,because there is no reply from B or A.in addition when I add dest address A to routing table B (add route -host A metric 1 dev eth0) it is done successfully and I can see address A in routing table B and vice versa. IP address of com A is :192.168.3.175 and IP address com B is :192.168.2.207.
This is Hello message :
HELLO MSG ***START***
baseMsg : UBit= 0
msgtype = 100
msglength = 20
msgId = 1
chpTLV:
TLV:
BaseTLV :UBit = 0
FBit = 0
type = 400
length = 4
chpTLV data : holdtime = 15
chpTLV Flags : target = 0
request = 0
res = 0
Hello msg does not have TRAdr TLV
csnTLV:
TLV:
BaseTLV : UBit = 0
FBit = 0
type = 402
length = 4
csnTLV data : value = 4
HELLO MSG ***END***
MESG size :34(34)
ldp-event : unknown TLV
What do you think about it?How can I solve this problem?
Thank you in advance.
Best Regards
Zahra.
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-04-29 00:19:16
|
ifconfig eth0 allmulti On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 02:12:59AM -0700, farahmand zahra wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Thank you for your response,but I don't underestand what do you mean by do a allmulti,it's not a command!, how can I know that multicast is enabled on the interface? > > Thanks for your attention.do you have any other suggestion for this matter? > > I really need to solve this problem. > > Best regards, > > Zahra. > > > > --------------------------------- > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness -- James R. Leu |
|
From: farahmand z. <z_c...@ya...> - 2002-04-28 06:55:59
|
Hi all, i tried a below combination: ------- eth0 eth0 --------- : 1 :-----------------------: 2 : ------- 3.175 2.207 -------- all ip 192.168.* on both I have compiled kernel 2.4.13 and applied mpls-linux patch and compiled mpls-linux-1.0 and ldp-portable-0.060. on node 1: ifconfig eth0 192.168.3.175 netmask 255.255.255.0 up ip addr add 192.168.3.175/32 dev eth0 ip route add 192.168.2.207/32 dev eth0 ./mplsadm -L eth0:0 ./mplsadm -d /ldp_linux prompt>add global 10.129.152.10 prompt>add interface eth0 prompt>add route 192.168.2.207 dev eth0 and I repeated these steps in node 2,but when I set trace, only HELLO message is observed and no other messages are found.and when I do "show session",the response is "no session is established". What do you think about it?do you have any suggestion to solve this problem?it is very important for me. Thank you. Zahra. --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness |
|
From: venda - y. <vy...@eu...> - 2002-04-27 12:42:43
|
Hi all,
Thanks a lot for your help Jim, weve already try your suggestion and its work. After several trial, we know if we use only 2 router (ler ler) ip will be faster than mpls, then if we use 3 router (ler lsr ler) mpls will be a little faster than ip (without running mplsadm d, if we run this command ip will be faster than mpls).
After trying the simple one, we want to try another type. And we need some help to check our program , whether is it right or not.
The topology that we use is like this :
1111 2222
===> ===>
<=== <===
4444 3333
Host A ----- LER A ----- LSR A ----- LER B ----- Host B
Eth0 eth0 eth1 eth2 eth0 eth0 eth1 eth0
|eth2 |eth1 |eth2
| | |
| 8989(up)|9999(down) |
| | |
| |eth2 |
--------- LSR B ---------
5555 6666
===> ===>
<=== <===
8888 7777
The ip number that we use :
Host A  eth0 : 192.167.1.1
LER A  eth0 : 192.167.1.2
eth1 : 192.167.2.2
eth2 : 192.167.8.2
LSR A  eth2 : 192.167.2.3
eth0 : 192.167.3.3
eth1 : 192.167.5.3
LER B  eth0 : 192.167.3.4
eth1 : 192.167.4.4
eth2 : 192.167.6.4
LSR B  eth0 : 192.167.4.5
eth1 : 192.167.8.5
eth2 : 192.167.5.5
Host B  eth0 : 192.167.6.6
Host A and host B - without MPLS
LER A :
root# mplsadm -v L eth0:0
root# mplsadm v L eth1:0
root# mplsadm v L eth2:0
root#route add 192.167.6.6/32 dev eth1
root#route add 192.167.6.6/32 dev eth2
root#mplsadm v -A B O gen:1111:eth1:ipv4:192.167.2.3 f 192.167.6.6/32
root#mplsadm v -A B O gen:5555:eth2:ipv4:192.167.8.5 f 192.167.6.6/32
root# mplsadm v A I gen:4444:0
root# mplsadm v A I gen:4444:0
LSR A:
root# mplsadm -v L eth0:0
root# mplsadm v L eth1:0
root# mplsadm v L eth2:0
root# mplsadm v A I gen:1111:0 O gen:2222:eth0:ipv4:192.167.3.4 B
root# mplsadm v A I gen:1111:0 O gen:9999:eth1:ipv4:192.167.5.5 B
root# mplsadm v A I gen:3333:0 O gen:4444:eth2:ipv4:192.167.2.2 B
root# mplsadm v A I gen:3333:0 O gen:9999:eth1:ipv4:192.167.5.5 B
root# mplsadm v A I gen:8989:0 O gen:4444:eth2:ipv4:192.167.2.2 B
root# mplsadm v A I gen:8989:0 O gen:2222:eth0:ipv4:192.167.3.4 B
LSR B:
root# mplsadm -v L eth0:0
root# mplsadm v L eth1:0
root# mplsadm v L eth2:0
root# mplsadm v A I gen:5555:0 O gen:6666:eth0:ipv4:192.167.4.4 B
root# mplsadm v A I gen:5555:0 O gen:8989:eth2:ipv4:192.167.5.3 B
root# mplsadm v A I gen:7777:0 O gen:8888:eth1:ipv4:192.167.8.2 B
root# mplsadm v A I gen:7777:0 O gen:8989:eth2:ipv4:192.167.5.3 B
root# mplsadm v A I gen:9999:0 O gen:8888:eth1:ipv4:192.167.8.2 B
root# mplsadm v A I gen:9999:0 O gen:6666:eth0:ipv4:192.167.4.4 B
LER B :
root# mplsadm -v L eth0:0
root# mplsadm v L eth1:0
root# mplsadm v L eth2:0
root#route add 192.167.1.1/32 dev eth0
root#route add 192.167.1.1/32 dev eth1
root#mplsadm v -A B O gen:3333:eth0:ipv4:192.167.3.3 f 192.167.1.1/32
root#mplsadm v -A B O gen:7777:eth1:ipv4:192.167.4.5 f 192.167.1.1/32
root# mplsadm v A I gen:2222:0
root# mplsadm v A I gen:6666:0
thats the program that we write. Is that program true or false? We waiting for your suggestion. Thank you very much
venda, andy, amiek.
Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account at http://www.eudoramail.com
|
533 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
