mpls-linux-general Mailing List for MPLS for Linux (Page 138)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
Menu
▾
▴
mpls-linux-general — Mailing list for general discussion about MPLS for Linux
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(26) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(71) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(123) |
Mar
(67) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(75) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(79) |
Oct
(85) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(39) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(74) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(105) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(91) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(62) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(63) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-15 03:37:45
|
I personally have lots of success with 3com 3c90x cards. Jim On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 03:50:54PM +0300, xia...@no... wrote: > Hi, MPLS for Linux guru! > > I am going to construct a test enviroment with MPLS for Linux, the hardware is just compatible PC. > > On each PC, there will be 3 ethernet cards. > > I wonder what kind of Ethernet card I should configure with, which will be supported the best by MPLS features. I try to avoid uncessary trouble-shooting works. > > > Thanks! > > -- > Ben > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-15 03:34:35
|
Try adding -DMPLS_LINUX to the make file. Once you do this you will still run into an issue with non-uniform label distribution. I'm working on a fix for this. Jim On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 09:28:54PM +0530, Hariharan Kunchithaptham wrote: > Hi, > > I tried the ldp-portable from CVS and it worked fine.No Warnings... > > The "/proc/net/mpls_out" file is not getting populated. > > We have a network like this, > Host A - Router B > (Linux) (Cisco) > > The label entries from Host A are available on the Router. > The label entries in the Router are not getting propogated to the Linux box. > The /proc/net/mpls_out is empty. > > Will the ldp process populate the /proc/net/mpls_out file ? > > Am I missing something here. > > Any help on this will be highly appreciated. > > Thanks, > Hari. > >From: "Hariharan Kunchithaptham" To: > >mpl...@li... Subject: [mpls-linux-general] (no > >subject) Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 23:33:24 +0530 > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx > >From mpl...@li... Mon, 06 May 2002 11:05:11 -0700 > Received: from [216.136.171.252] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBEA010AF009040043253D888ABFCFC760; Mon, 06 May 2002 11:04:39 -0700 > Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) > by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) > id 174mqD-0004lP-00; Mon, 06 May 2002 11:04:05 -0700 > Received: from f88.law11.hotmail.com ([64.4.17.88] helo=hotmail.com) > by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) > id 174mpk-0007Hi-00 > for <mpl...@li...>; Mon, 06 May 2002 11:03:36 -0700 > Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; > Mon, 6 May 2002 11:03:25 -0700 > Received: from 203.199.239.172 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; > Mon, 06 May 2002 18:03:24 GMT > X-Originating-IP: [203.199.239.172] > From: "Hariharan Kunchithaptham" <hku...@ho...> > To: mpl...@li... > Bcc: > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/html > Message-ID: <F88...@ho...> > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2002 18:03:25.0235 (UTC) FILETIME=[512AF030:01C1F528] > Subject: [mpls-linux-general] (no subject) > Sender: mpl...@li... > Errors-To: mpl...@li... > X-BeenThere: mpl...@li... > X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net > Precedence: bulk > List-Help: <mailto:mpl...@li...?subject=help> > List-Post: <mailto:mpl...@li...> > List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general>, > <mailto:mpl...@li...?subject=subscribe> > List-Id: Disscussion related to MPLS for Linux <mpls-linux-general.lists.sourceforge.net> > List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general>, > <mailto:mpl...@li...?subject=unsubscribe> > List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=mpls-linux-general> > X-Original-Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 23:33:24 +0530 > Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 23:33:24 +0530 > -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-15 03:31:29
|
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 04:01:51PM +0300, xia...@no... wrote: > Hi, there! > > Is this MPLS-linux IP version 6 compatible? > > I couldn't find document or email discussion on this topic. > > If it is not yet IPv6 OK, any schedule to make it so? By using the MPLS tunnel interface you can ingress IPv6 traffic onto an LSP. Currently there is not means to egress labeled traffic to the IPv6 stack. It wouldn't take much work to finish this, if your interested in finishing the work and testing it I can point you in the correct direction. Jim > > Thanks! > > > -- > Ben > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-15 03:13:06
|
I this case you will mant to assign a differnt label space to each incoming interface. Jim On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 11:06:35AM +0900, Kiyoung Jung wrote: > Hi, all. > > I want to identify the inlabel with input port information in ldp-linux. > In the case of outpot, outlabel structure have the related information. > But inlabel have no information directly, I think. In the case of no > information > of input port in inlabel, only just label merging is supported. > But sometimes same inlabels with different inputs port should be > treated differently. That is the case of GMPLS. > Is there anyone care about this problem? > > I'm looking at the session information in inlabel structure. > But it is difficult for me to get the wanted field from the session pointer. > > Regards. > > ---------------------------------------------------- > Kiyoung Jung (jj...@ic...) > Information and Communications University(ICU) > Broadband Network Laboratory (http://bnlab.icu.ac.kr) > 58-4 Hwaam-dong, Yusong-gu, Taejon, 305-732, KOREA > Tel)+82-42-866-6172, 016-370-1751 Fax)+82-42-866-6110 > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-15 03:12:08
|
You have the correct version. Jim On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 03:52:31AM -0700, farahmand zahra wrote: > Hi jim n all, > to grab the latest version of ldp-portable,I used > "ldp-portable" with no revision ,insteed of > modulename,and it was done, and now I have a directory > named "/ldp-portable", but I don't know,is it > sufficient or not? > Thank you in advance. > Z.Farah > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness > http://health.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-15 03:11:40
|
Make sure you have -DMPLS_LINUX define in the make file. Even is you do this you will still run into a prbelm with non-uniform label distribution. I'm working on a fix for it. Jim On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:35:44AM -0700, farahmand zahra wrote: > Hi jim n thank you for your response, > I grab the latest ldp-portable via CVS(it doesn't have > revision,I entered ldp-portable in modulename). > I changed directory to ldp-portable and typed "make > ldp_linux".it compiled successfully.I ran it like last > time,this time I saw LABEL MAPPING message and ADDRESS > message once at first,when I do "show session" a > line is displayed,and when I do "show databese" two > lines are displayed,but the files in /proc/net/mpls_* > are empty except mpls_labelspace n mpls_in at host A. > When I do "set trace 0xffffffff",I can see this > message in the monitor: > ldp_event: LDP_EVENT_TCP_DATA eror = 11 > in addition: > UDP data size = 0 > TP data size = -1 > What do they meant?, > In addition when I do "add route 192.168.2.0/32 > 192.168.2.206",TCP data size changes to some value(I > think 34 and then 22),then LABEL REQUEST message is > appeared and then NOTIFICATION message is appeared and > the programe aborts: > ldp_linux : ldp-fec.c:374:fec-tlv2ldp_fec:assertion > '0' failed. > Do you know about it? > I really need your response. > Thanks in advance. > Z.Farah > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness > http://health.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-15 03:06:21
|
Do a make clean first. Jim On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:37:40PM +0800, pingping han wrote: >=20 > When I was compiling the ldp-protable, it occured the following error: >=20 > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------------- >=20 > /usr/bin/ld: port/ldp_linux.o: Relocation in generic ELF (EM:2) >=20 > port/ldp_linux.o: could not read symbols: File in wrong format >=20 > collected 2: ld returned 1 exit status >=20 > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ----------------------------- >=20 > I dont know why? :-( >=20 > what conditons will it need when compiling ldp_linux? >=20 > gcc version? or other ? >=20 > Thanks=20 >=20 > Aileen Han ^o^ >=20 > =20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------- > Do You Yahoo!? > =B5=BD=D1=C5=BB=A2=B5=F7=B2=E9=D6=D0=D0=C4=B7=A2=B1=ED=C4=FA=B5=C4=D2=E2= =BC=FB=A1=A3 --=20 James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-15 03:05:48
|
Depending what distribution you are using (RedHat Slackware etc) will determine which you shoudl use (make install or make bzlilo) Jim On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:42:01AM +0530, Hariharan Kunchithaptham wrote: > Hi Jim, > > After doing a make install , the MPLS was enabled.We were are earlier using > make bzLilo. > > Is there any problem with make bzLilo , Just curious :) > > Thanks for your help. > > Have a great weekend > > Hari. > > > >From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > >Reply-To: jl...@mi... > >To: Hariharan Kunchithaptham <hku...@ho...> > >CC: mpl...@li... > >Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] MPLS on Linux Enabled or Not ? > >Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 12:57:37 -0500 > > > >How did you install the kernel? 'make install'? 'make bzlilo'? > >What distribution are you using RedHat? If so use 'make install' to > >install > >your kernel (make user to make your modules and install them as well) > > > >Jim > > > > > >On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:19:59PM +0530, Hariharan Kunchithaptham wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am running a Linux-2.4.9 kernel,patched with MPLS (0.996). > > > All the necessary config options were enabled.The patch went thro fine. > > > > > > I found that the "dmesg" does not contain any MPLS info > > > , and the "/proc/net/mpls_*" directory is not available. > > > > > > I am not able to verify if the MPLS is enabled in the kernel. > > > > > > Any help will be highly appreciated. > > > > > > TIA, > > > Hari. > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > > > > > > >-- > >James R. Leu > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-15 03:04:12
|
MPLS over ATM use AAL5NULL encapulation. The (empty) shim is placed right after the AAL5 header. The vpi/vci or just vci are the label valued used for label switching. It is poosible to use more then one label (stacking) by placing more generic labels after the empty shim. (ie there is always one empty label= value at the top of the label stack found in an AAL5 frame ... same hold= s true for frame relay). Jim On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:10:28AM +1000, Jack f wrote: >=20 >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I'm new to MPLS. I was wondering when implementing MPLS over ATM, where= is=20 > the MPLS header, in the VPI/VCI or just the VCI field of the ATM header= ? >=20 > If it's just using the VCI field, ATM should still be able to forward t= he=20 > packet with just the VPI field right? >=20 > Thanks > Jack >=20 > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world=92s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.=20 > http://www.hotmail.com >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________________________ >=20 > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We sup= ply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: bandwidth@sourceforge.= net > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-15 02:59:29
|
Hello On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 06:48:59PM +0300, Alexander Sayenko wrote: > Hi > > I use mpls-linux-1.0 and ldp-portable-0.060 > > I have two hosts connected to the same subnetwork which make use of LDP. After I issue > > add global ... > > add interface ... > commands the exchange of labels occur (I can see it with network analyzer) but one of the hosts do not ALWAYS build LSP properly. So, from host A to host B all packets come with labels, but in the opposite direction they come without them. > There is a know issue with un-even label distribution. I'm working on this problem. Jim > ldp_linux on the host A outputs > FEC: .... > and on the host B it outputs > index: .... > > Explicit > > add route ... > command on host B helps but sometimes ldp_linux crashes. > > By the way, what do the following messages mean which I use to see in ldp_linux output ? > > PRT: ldp_state_recv_init: cannot find adj > PRT: Gratuitous search !! > > Another problem is the following. Suppose I have only one network interface (eth0). If I issue the following command > > add interface eth4 > the ldp_linux will report an error but somehow add this interface (it is possible to check it with show interfaces). If I issue then > > del interface appropriate_number > the ldp_linux will crash > > Quite often the whole system crashes when I exit from ldp_linux. > > Sincerely, > Sayenko Alex -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-15 02:54:33
|
Hello, On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:12:57PM +0530, Vardhan_Walavalkar wrote: > > Hi, > Ldp portable code currently does not allow multiple labels for an > interface. Why? What do you mean? It can distrubute any number of labels, it depends on how the filtering is implemented. > The current label assignment is done in terms of the label space for each > interface. However how is this assigned in the first place. Also how is LSP > merging currently > cupported in the ldp code? The label manager in ldp_linux is very rudimentary. Any real porting layer will implement a much more sophisticated label manager. > > thanks, > Vardhan > > (Im sorry if this is not the right forum for ldp-portable questions. If not, > please inform me about the > correct one) > ************************************************************************** > This email (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the > intended recipient/s and may contain material that is CONFIDENTIAL AND > PRIVATE COMPANY INFORMATION. Any review or reliance by others or copying or > distribution or forwarding of any or all of the contents in this message is > STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact > the sender by email and delete all copies; your cooperation in this regard > is appreciated. > ************************************************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: Jorge B. [DTI2] <jo...@dt...> - 2002-05-14 09:36:52
|
Hi all,
This is a diff against the cvs version that compiles (and I hope works
;) with the latest mpls-linux kernel patch and latest cvs zebra daemon.
Cheers,
-Jorge
==============================================================
Jorge Boncompte - Tecnico de sistemas
DTI2 - Desarrollo de la Tecnologia de las Comunicaciones
--------------------------------------------------------------
C/ Abogado Enriquez Barrios, 5 14004 CORDOBA (SPAIN)
Tlf: +34 957 761395 / FAX: +34 957 450380
--------------------------------------------------------------
jo...@dt... _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ http://www.dti2.net
==============================================================
- Sin pistachos no hay Rock & Roll...
- Without wicker a basket cannot be done.
==============================================================
|
|
From: <zjh...@so...> - 2002-05-14 02:53:48
|
hi,jim and all In the code the setsockopt have been called to set the SO_REUSEADDR opt on UDP HELLO socket and TCP listenning socket.I can't understand why so? I have read UNIX Networking Programing (written by W.Richard Stevens).There four reasons have been given for using SO_REUSEADDR opt .The code use the opt for which reason? Wish your help!! All thanks! your sincerely: zhangjh |
|
From: Morvan D. <mo...@so...> - 2002-05-13 19:40:39
|
Hi, I try with CFLAGS=-DMPLS_LINUX and without it. Ldp-portable don'nt work in the two cases! With -DMPLS_LINUX option /proc/net/mpls_in file show "POP PEEK" entries and the others /proc/net/mpls_* are blank. I could'nt establish and LSP like README.sample using ldp-portable. I'm using kernel 2.4.12. If Anyone make it work let me know. Cheers, Morvan. >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: help on ldp(helllllllllllp) (Kiyoung Jung) > >Message: 1 >From: "Kiyoung Jung" <jj...@ic...> >To: "farahmand zahra" <z_c...@ya...> >Cc: <mpl...@li...> >Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] help on ldp(helllllllllllp) >Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 14:23:47 +0900 > >I think you should include -DMPLS_LINUX option in CFLAGS to >work with MPLS forwarding engine in Linux kernel. >As you can see, this option is commented out. >This should be : > >CFLAGS = -g -I. -wall -D__LDP_LINUX__ -Werror -DMPLS_LINUX > >Regards. > >---------------------------------------------------- >Kiyoung Jung (jj...@ic...) >Information and Communications University(ICU) >Broadband Network Laboratory (http://bnlab.icu.ac.kr) >58-4 Hwaam-dong, Yusong-gu, Taejon, 305-732, KOREA >Tel)+82-42-866-6172, 016-370-1751 Fax)+82-42-866-6110 > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: farahmand zahra >To: sourceforge >Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 7:14 PM >Subject: [mpls-linux-general] help on ldp(helllllllllllp) > > >Hi jim n all, >I really need your help , my ldp-portable doesn't work properly and I don't >know what is wrong?! >I have redhat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.13 (MPLS patched).I got the latest >ldp-portable via CVS ,first, I have a simple question:I compiled >ldp-portable in directory ldp-portable by typing "make ldp_linux" and it was >compiled successfully,is it compiled with MPLS_LINUX ?How can I make >sure?(The first line in the Makefile in directory ldp-portable:CFLAGS >= -g -I. -wall -D__LDP_LINUX__ -Werror >#-DMPLS_LINUX). >I have configured 2 machines as follows : > > lo 10.0.0.1 lo 10.0.0.2 > ---------- ----------- > | A |------------------------------| B | > ---------- ----------- > .206 | 192.168.2.0/24 .207| >------------------------------------------------------------ >PC B: >bash# ip addr add 10.0.0.2/32 dev lo >bash#ip route add 10.0.0.1/32 via 192.168.2.206 >routing table in PC B: >Des Gateway Genmask Flags >Metric Ref Use Interface >10.0.0.1 sunrise 255.255.255.255 UGH >0 0 0 eth0 >192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U >0 0 0 eth0 >127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U >0 0 0 lo >default itrcprox3.itrc 0.0.0.0 UG >0 0 0 eth0 >./mplsadm -L eth0:0 >prompt> add global 10.0.0.2 >ENTER : ##args## >EXIT : ##args## >ENTER : ##args## >EXIT : ##args## >ENTER : ##args## >ENTER : ##args## >Adding interface lo >Adding interface eth0 >Adding route 0a000001/32 via 2 >Adding route c0a80200/24 via 2 >Adding route 7f000000/8 via 1 >Adding route 00000000/0 via 2 >Adding route 0a000002/32 via 1 >EXIT : ##args## >EXIT : ##args## >ENTER : ##args## >EXIT : ##args## >Adding global object with LSRID 0a000002 >prompt>set trace 0xffffffff >Set tracing flag to ffffffff >prompt>add interface eth0 >Adding interface eth0 >prompt>show session >2 c0a802ce 45 5 >prompt>show database >1 0a000001/32 2 via2 >2 0a000002/32 3 via2 >3 7f000000/8 3 via2 >4 c0a80200/24 3 via2 >5 7f000000/8 2 via2 >6 c0a80200/24 2 via2 >prompt>show route >0a000001/32 via c0a802ce:2 >0a000002/32 via 00000000:1 >7f000000/8 via 00000000:1 >c0a80200/24 via 00000000:2 >00000000/0 via c0a80201:2 > >prompt>show interface >2 eth0 >I can see HELLO,INIT,KEEP ALIVE,ADDRESS,LABEL MAPPING messages,but all files >in /proc/net/mpls_* >are empty. >Any help from you are greately appriciated.I'm waiting to hear from you and >thank you inadvance. >Best Regards, >Zahra Farahmand. > > > > > >Do You Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Shopping - Mother's Day is May 12th! > > > |
|
From: Morvan D. <mo...@so...> - 2002-05-13 17:31:34
|
Hello! I follow the ldp-portable/ldp-linux/README.sample but could'nt establish a LSP to 10.0.0.2/32. I see in ldp_linux prompt messages exchange, but /proc/net/mpls_* files are blank, except for mpls_in that have "POP PEEK" entries. I used the today CVS version of ldp-portable, kernel 2.4.12, patched with the today CVS mpls-linux. Some one in this mailing list have the last CVS ldp-portable working fine, .i.e, could succesfully establish an LSP using it? Cheers, Morvan. |
|
From: Kiyoung J. <jj...@ic...> - 2002-05-13 17:00:35
|
SGksIGFsbC4NCg0KSSBoYXZlIHNvbWUgcXVlc3Rpb25zIHdpdGggbGRwLWxpbnV4IGFuZCBuZWVk IHlvdXIgaGVscC4NCg0KRmlyc3QgcXVlc3Rpb24gOg0KDQpJJ20gdGVzdGluZyBsZHAtbGludXgg d2l0aCAzIFBDcy4gDQpXaGVuIEkgdXNlIHRoZSBsZHAtcG9ydGFibGUgZnJvbSBzb3VyY2Vmb3Jn ZS5uZXQgZGlyZWN0bHkgZG93bmxvYWRhYmxlIHZlcnNpb24gKDAuOTk2KSwgDQp0aGVyZSBpcyBu byBwcm9ibGVtIHdpdGggTFNQIHNldHVwIGJldHdlZW4gZWRnZS10by1lZGdlLCBmb3J3YXJkIGRp cmVjdGlvbiBhbmQgcmV2ZXJzZSBkaXJlY3Rpb24uDQpCdXQgd2hlbiBJIHRlc3Qgd2l0aCBsZHAt bGludXggZnJvbSBDVlMsIG9uZSBkaXJldGlvbiBMU1AgbGFiZWwgYmluZGluZyBpcyBmYWlsZWQs IGVzcGVjaWFsbHkgb24gdGhlDQplZ3Jlc3MgTFNSLiBJdCBtYWtlIGEgaW5sYWJlbCBhbmQgZGVs IGl0IGltbWVkaWF0ZWx5LiANCklzIHRoZXJlIGFueW9uZSB3aG8gZXhwZXJpZW5jZSBzYW1lIHBy b2JsZW0/DQoNClRoZSBjb25maWd1cmF0aW9uIGlzIGxpa2UgdGhpczoNCihBLWxvIDEwLjEuMS4x KS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0oQi1sbyAxMC4yLjIuMiktLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0oQy1sbzoxMC4zLjMuMykNCiAgICAgICAgICBldGgwOjE5Mi4xNjguMi4xICAgICAgICAgIGV0 aDA6MTkyLjE2OC4yLjIgICAgIGV0aDE6MTkyLjE2OC4zLjEgICAgICAgIGV0aDA6MTkyLjE2OC4z LjINCg0KSW4gQSwgDQpyb3V0ZSBhZGQgMTAuMS4xLjEgbG8NCnJvdXRlIGFkZCAxMC4zLjMuMyBn dyAxOTIuMTY4LjIuMg0KDQo+YSBnIDEwLjEuMS4xDQo+YSBpIGV0aDANCg0KSW4gQg0Kcm91dGUg YWRkIDEwLjEuMS4xIGd3IDE5Mi4xNjguMy4yDQpyb3V0ZSBhZGQgMTAuMy4zLjMgZ3cgMTkyLjE2 OC4yLjENCj5hIGcgMTAuMi4yLjINCj5hIGkgZXRoMA0KPmEgaSBldGgxDQoNCkluIEMNCnJvdXRl IGFkZCAxMC4zLjMuMyBsbw0Kcm91dGUgYWRkIDEwLjEuMS4xIGd3IDE5Mi4xNjguMy4xDQo+YSBn IDEwLjMuMy4zDQo+YSBpIGV0aDANCg0KQWZ0ZXIgc2Vzc2lvbiBpcyBjcmVhdGVkIGJldHdlZW4g ZGlyZWN0IHBlZXJzLCBub2RlIEMgbWFrZSBhIGlubGFiZWwgYW5kIGRlbGV0ZSBpdCBpbW1lZGlh dGVseS4NCkFuZCB0aGUgTFNQIGZyb20gbm9kZSBBIHRvIG5vZGUgQyBpcyBub3QgY3JlYXRlZC4g U29ycnkgZm9yIG5vdCBzaG93aW5nIGRldGFpbCB0cmFjZSBkYXRhIA0KZnJvbSBlYWNoIG5vZGUu IEkganVzdCB3b25kZXIgaWYgb3RoZXIgb25lIGhhdmUgc2ltaWxhciBwcm9ibGVtLg0KDQoNClNl Y29uZCBRdWVzdGlvbiA6DQoNCg0KQWxzbywgSSB3b25kZXIgaWYgSSBjYW4gZGVsZXRlIGV4aXN0 aW5nIExTUCB3aXRoIENMSSBvciBhbnl0aGluZy4NCkluIENMSSwgSSBjYW4gYWRkIHJvdXRlLCBi dXQgbm90aW5nIGlzIGhhcHBlbmVkLiAoSSBleHBlY3RlZCBhIG5ldyBMU1AuKQ0KQ3VycmVudGx5 LCBvbmx5IEkgY2FuIGRvIGlzICJkZWwgZ2xvYmFsIiBvciAicXVpdCIgaW4gb25lIG5vZSBzbyBl bnRpcmUgTElCIG9uIGFsbCB0aHJlZSBub2RlIA0KaXMgZGlzYXBwZWFyZWQuIEZvciBleGFtcGxl LCBJIHRoaW5rIEkgY2FuJ3QgZGlyZWN0bHkgY2FsbCBsZHBfaW5sYWJlbF9kZWwoKSBvciBsZHBf aW4yb3V0X2RlbCgpIGluIG1wbHNfbGludXhfaW1wbC5jLiAgSXQgd2lsbCBub3QgZWZmZWN0IG9u IHRoZSBkYXRhc3RydWN0dXJlcyBpbiBMRFAsIGp1c3Qgb24gdGhlIExJQiANCmluIE1QTFMgZm9y d2FyZGluZyBlbmdpbmUuIElmIGFueW9uZSB0ZWxsIG1lIHRoZSB3YXkgb3IgaWRlYSBhYm91dCB0 aGlzIHByb2JsZW0sDQppdCB3aWxsIHZlcnkgaGVscGZ1bCBmb3IgbWUuDQoNCg0KVGhhbmtzIGZv ciByZWFkaW5nLg0KDQpSZWdhcmRzLg0KDQpQLlMuIEphbWVzLCBHT09EIHRvIHNlZSB5b3UgYWdh aW4hDQoNCiANCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0NCktpeW91bmcgSnVuZyAoamp1bmdraUBpY3UuYWMua3IpDQpJbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBhbmQg Q29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbnMgVW5pdmVyc2l0eShJQ1UpDQpCcm9hZGJhbmQgTmV0d29yayBMYWJvcmF0 b3J5IChodHRwOi8vYm5sYWIuaWN1LmFjLmtyKQ0KNTgtNCBId2FhbS1kb25nLCBZdXNvbmctZ3Us IFRhZWpvbiwgMzA1LTczMiwgS09SRUENClRlbCkrODItNDItODY2LTYxNzIsIDAxNi0zNzAtMTc1 MSBGYXgpKzgyLTQyLTg2Ni02MTEwIA0K |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-05-13 16:16:16
|
Hey folks, Sorry for the LOOONNNNGGG silence. I was at Networld + InterOp Las Vegas doing MPLS interoperability testing. I hope to spin through my mail box this evening answering questions and responding to requests. Laters, Jim -- James R. Leu |
|
From: <zjh...@so...> - 2002-05-13 13:18:30
|
hi,jim
how are you ? Are you busy ? Wish you happy in your life !
Now I have a question to discuss with you.
In your code you create a UDP socket to send LDP Link Hellos .This is basic discovery mechanism .In your LDP code you make the UDP socket join a multicast group by setsockopt( ). This work well on ethernet link because the if->destaddr is a multicast group addr.
In the case of PPP,you also join a multicast by this way;but in your code the destaddr of ppp interface is not a multicast group addr.So there is the problem .
Does I understand your code correctly ? Perhaps you can give me your design of the code.
Why your code have a destaddr in the ldp_if_linux struct. What's the use of the data element "destaddr "?
Forgive my pool English!! you can also mail me:jh...@ma... your answer!
All thanks!
your sincerely :
zhangjh
|
|
From: <ale...@re...> - 2002-05-13 05:53:33
|
Where can i find the latest driver for atm turboways 25 (an address where i can find a driver that works) Alexandre |
|
From: Abhijit G. <gab...@ee...> - 2002-05-13 05:48:06
|
>As far as I know, there is no difference between the ethernet NICs. >If you look at the mpls-linux patch file, it don't concern about the >ethernet NIC drivers. Absolutely.. Just ensure to compile the code of the drivers in the kernel inline than making modules(s). This will ensure there are no surprises when you boot in the MPLS kernel. -abhijit |
|
From: Kiyoung J. <jj...@ic...> - 2002-05-13 05:29:00
|
As far as I know, there is no difference between the ethernet NICs. If you look at the mpls-linux patch file, it don't concern about the ethernet NIC drivers. Regards. ---------------------------------------------------- Kiyoung Jung (jj...@ic...) Information and Communications University(ICU) Broadband Network Laboratory (http://bnlab.icu.ac.kr) 58-4 Hwaam-dong, Yusong-gu, Taejon, 305-732, KOREA Tel)+82-42-866-6172, 016-370-1751 Fax)+82-42-866-6110 ----- Original Message ----- From: xia...@no... To: mpl...@li... Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:50 PM Subject: [mpls-linux-general] Ethernet card recommendation Hi, MPLS for Linux guru! I am going to construct a test enviroment with MPLS for Linux, the hardware is just compatible PC. On each PC, there will be 3 ethernet cards. I wonder what kind of Ethernet card I should configure with, which will be supported the best by MPLS features. I try to avoid uncessary trouble-shooting works. Thanks! -- Ben _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... _______________________________________________ mpls-linux-general mailing list mpl...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general |
|
From: Kiyoung J. <jj...@ic...> - 2002-05-13 05:26:06
|
I think you should include -DMPLS_LINUX option in CFLAGS to work with MPLS forwarding engine in Linux kernel. As you can see, this option is commented out. This should be : CFLAGS = -g -I. -wall -D__LDP_LINUX__ -Werror -DMPLS_LINUX Regards. ---------------------------------------------------- Kiyoung Jung (jj...@ic...) Information and Communications University(ICU) Broadband Network Laboratory (http://bnlab.icu.ac.kr) 58-4 Hwaam-dong, Yusong-gu, Taejon, 305-732, KOREA Tel)+82-42-866-6172, 016-370-1751 Fax)+82-42-866-6110 ----- Original Message ----- From: farahmand zahra To: sourceforge Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 7:14 PM Subject: [mpls-linux-general] help on ldp(helllllllllllp) Hi jim n all, I really need your help , my ldp-portable doesn't work properly and I don't know what is wrong?! I have redhat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.13 (MPLS patched).I got the latest ldp-portable via CVS ,first, I have a simple question:I compiled ldp-portable in directory ldp-portable by typing "make ldp_linux" and it was compiled successfully,is it compiled with MPLS_LINUX ?How can I make sure?(The first line in the Makefile in directory ldp-portable:CFLAGS = -g -I. -wall -D__LDP_LINUX__ -Werror #-DMPLS_LINUX). I have configured 2 machines as follows : lo 10.0.0.1 lo 10.0.0.2 ---------- ----------- | A |------------------------------| B | ---------- ----------- .206 | 192.168.2.0/24 .207| ------------------------------------------------------------ PC B: bash# ip addr add 10.0.0.2/32 dev lo bash#ip route add 10.0.0.1/32 via 192.168.2.206 routing table in PC B: Des Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Interface 10.0.0.1 sunrise 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo default itrcprox3.itrc 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 ./mplsadm -L eth0:0 prompt> add global 10.0.0.2 ENTER : ##args## EXIT : ##args## ENTER : ##args## EXIT : ##args## ENTER : ##args## ENTER : ##args## Adding interface lo Adding interface eth0 Adding route 0a000001/32 via 2 Adding route c0a80200/24 via 2 Adding route 7f000000/8 via 1 Adding route 00000000/0 via 2 Adding route 0a000002/32 via 1 EXIT : ##args## EXIT : ##args## ENTER : ##args## EXIT : ##args## Adding global object with LSRID 0a000002 prompt>set trace 0xffffffff Set tracing flag to ffffffff prompt>add interface eth0 Adding interface eth0 prompt>show session 2 c0a802ce 45 5 prompt>show database 1 0a000001/32 2 via2 2 0a000002/32 3 via2 3 7f000000/8 3 via2 4 c0a80200/24 3 via2 5 7f000000/8 2 via2 6 c0a80200/24 2 via2 prompt>show route 0a000001/32 via c0a802ce:2 0a000002/32 via 00000000:1 7f000000/8 via 00000000:1 c0a80200/24 via 00000000:2 00000000/0 via c0a80201:2 prompt>show interface 2 eth0 I can see HELLO,INIT,KEEP ALIVE,ADDRESS,LABEL MAPPING messages,but all files in /proc/net/mpls_* are empty. Any help from you are greately appriciated.I'm waiting to hear from you and thank you inadvance. Best Regards, Zahra Farahmand. Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Mother's Day is May 12th! |
|
From: <an...@at...> - 2002-05-12 17:27:11
|
Hi, I'm running ldp-portable with an MPLS enabled kernel and have a couple targeted questions about how ldp-portable works. These first two may be related - Why in add_route is dest->out_if_handle left at 0 ? _netlink_fib_callback - what is the eventual intended function of this ? ...and a couple potentially silly questions - What's with the ## args ## in the print and trace macros ? Does Geocrawler have a way to search this list's archive or download the archive ? Or is there a search engine that indexes this (the obvious ones do not appear to) ? Thanks, Dave Ward |
|
From: <xia...@no...> - 2002-05-10 12:51:03
|
Hi, MPLS for Linux guru! I am going to construct a test enviroment with MPLS for Linux, the = hardware is just compatible PC. On each PC, there will be 3 ethernet cards. I wonder what kind of Ethernet card I should configure with, which will = be supported the best by MPLS features. I try to avoid uncessary = trouble-shooting works. Thanks! -- Ben |
|
From: <la...@ne...> - 2002-05-09 14:45:12
|
Hi All, I would like to setup MPLS ATM at home. I am wondering what sort of NIC I should get. Should I invest in an ATM NIC, Ethernet, Gig-E? What do people think of the iPhase 155 Mbps 5575? I would greatly appreciate any thought you might have on this. Cheers, Dave. |
533 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
