Re: [Mjpeg-developer] Include-files discussions

[Gernot Z. <gz...@ly...>]

Hej !

> =09Doesn't that presume multiple instances of the same project?  Granted
> =09I've only been "on the project" for a few years but I've never ever
> =09had more than 1 instantiation of mjpegtools installed at one time.
That is because the developer version always was stable enough to be used
in everyday use - if a major redesign is being done in the devtree, and
you still want to use mjpegtools for daily encoding, you might want to
have two versions installed (just like it is for GStreamer - although I
am more a friend of incremental development, and don=B4t like it when the
devtree is broken, I see the use of versioning when the break has to
happen).

To the include-files: the inbetween scheme (some under mjpegtools/,
others not) is also an idea. Just make sure it is well documented with
example files - it=B4s quite frustrating for new developers to get stuck
on picking the include files from "the right level".

But with those remarks, I have to withdraw from discussion again, sorry:
The shadows of a new/my first SIGGRAPH-project start to creep over me and
I will need to concentrate fully on that now :-/
But: I am glad that things are still happening in the mjpegtools :-)

Servus,
  Gernot

--=20
T----------------------------W-E-L-C-O-M-E------------------------------T
|  The Austria <=3D> Sweden <=3D> Germany connection.....                  =
 H
O  http://www.mpi-sb.mpg.de/~gziegler | http://lysator.liu.se/~gz       E
\------------------------------F-U-T-U-R-E------------------------------/