From: Matti H. <mat...@ni...> - 2002-11-12 20:33:16
|
Bernhard Praschinger: >>ppmtoy4m: -v 0 -S 420_mpeg2 -L -I b -F 600:24 -A 8:5 >>mpeg2enc: -v 0 -f 4 -F 3 -n p -a 2 -b 2500 -I 1 -r 16 -q 7 -Q 2 -V 256 > >You do not need to specify -a 2 because 2 is the default, the same with >-I 1. Yes, I know some options are redundant but I have included them just to learn them and those default strings also act as templates so I can change their values easier. I vaguely remember reading somewhere that mpeg2enc defaults to interlaced output if the input resolution goes over a certain limit? >Why do you use that strange defaults for ppmtoy4m (I hope the third p is >an accident) for -F an -A ? Because I think mpeg2enc has no option for >encoding a that unusual pixel aspect ratio (-A). -A 8:5 in ppmtoy4m is filled by MediaPipe GUI. Also I wondered where that 8:5 came from until I discovered that, for example, if the output is PAL 480 x 576, then 480x(8:5) x 576 = 768 x 576 which is "True" computer square-pixel resolution. The same MediaPipe default calculation seems to apply to other resolutions as well. But based on my tests, omitting -A 8:5 didn't seem to make any difference in the final output dimensions via TV so I guess I can just take it off. BTW, there is a nice page describing these obscure Digital Video Resolution and Aspect Ratio Conversions at: <http://www.iki.fi/znark/video/conversion/> >Also which frame rate do you relly have, I do not know a norm that has >600:24. I gues you want NTSC so your ratio will be 30000:1001 or >60000:1001. 600:24 = 25, i.e. PAL frame rate. The interlaced output is OK with this setting although now I wonder whether I should use 1200:24 = 50 which is PAL field rate? Oh, so many options... >When you rest the frame rate to a correct size you do not hat to use the >mpeg2enc -n p option. -n p (PAL) seems to be the default so there is another redundant option at least for PAL users. >The -q option controls the minimum quantization of the output stream. >Quantization controls the precision with which image information is >encoded. The lower the value the better the image quality. Thanks for the clarification. > BTW, I have a SVCD on a Macintosh memo and cookbook at: > <http://www.sjoki.uta.fi/~shmhav/SVCD_on_a_Macintosh.txt> > >If you want I cann ad it as a reference to the howto. Please do but remember also the great RNC's Guide to SVCD on Mac which has taught me a lot: <http://homepage.mac.com/rnc/> Many thanks for your comments. I really appreciate your help, -- Matti Haveri <mat...@sj...> <http://www.sjoki.uta.fi/~shmhav/> |