From: Steven M. S. <sms@2BSD.COM> - 2007-09-23 16:31:47
|
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Burkhard Plaum wrote: > while porting yuvdeinterlace to gmerlin, I stumbled across something I think > would be a 0th order optimization. The attached patch calls > temporal_reconstruct_frame() only if the frame is actually written... > Is this acceptable or did I miss some deeper logic here? Looked acceptable to me ;) Checked in the change a couple minutes ago. Cheers, Steven Schultz |