From: Luca B. <lu...@in...> - 2005-06-10 12:52:15
|
Steven M. Schultz, on 09/06/2005 20:37 you wrote: > I use either the cvs version of libquicktime or libquicktime-0.9.5 > and those require gtk 2.4.x I installed libquicktime-cvs and gtk 2.4 is not mandatory: it is only if you want to build graphical player version (like glav for mjpegtools). > Why try to hold things back just so (some) systems can put off > being updated? Software marches on and trying to hold on to old > (moving towards being obsolete) versions is a futile effort. I completely agree: but, as now, glav does not use any new feature from gtk 2.4.x, and I don't think that mjpeg developer are trying to hold it old in order to keep compatibilty with gtk 2.2... > Because an occasional upgrade is a good thing for the system? ;) > > Is it really that hard to get a 2.4.x rpm? No, but sometimes I'm too lazy... > If you're using a more recent libquicktime (which is a Good Idea because > bugs get fixed, features added, and so on ) Very true!! The new installed libquicktime fixs a bug on audio stream (out of sync). > At some point in time you will have to have gtk 2.4.x - what is so > wrong about that time being now? None so wrong: I think very few systems use gtk < 2.4, and in this case the user could change manually "configure" script. But do you mean that someone has to make a glav enhancement? I'll try to find some time :-) > A system that doesn't include 2.4.x is getting to be pretty old and > it's time for an upgrade of more than just gtk :) My less powerful system (AMD K6-2 300) has gtk 2.4, because it is the last installed... Ciao, Luca |