From: Lennart B. <len...@st...> - 2005-10-06 12:55:18
|
Keith MARSHALL wrote: >Lennart Borgman wrote: > > >>Thanks for the pointers. My thought was however that there >>might be some kind of tests (unit tests?) for Posix compliance. >>I am not the one writing the scripts. >> >> > >And, like Greg, I don't know of any. > >Paul Jarc proposes a tool called `lintsh', which would analyse >shell scripts, and complain on finding portability issues; that >tool would seem to be vapourware, however. > >Until `lintsh' becomes a reality, if it ever does, I suspect >that you will be stuck with proof reading, and identifying those >portability issues by eye; of course, you *could* pitch in and >write your own `lintsh' implementation :-) > >Sorry, can't be more helpful here. > > It is very good. Knowing what knowledge can be found here helps a lot. I will try to look in some other places. |