Re: [MinGW-dvlpr] A proposal for Proposed package

[Greg C. <chi...@co...>]

On 2007-1-25 18:39 UTC, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> 
> I liked it the minute I created it but have never liked it since.  I 
> would like to rename the Proposed FRS package to Unmaintained.  
> Comments or objections?

I think the things labeled "Proposed" are something like development
snapshots that might eventually become "Current" releases, but need
more work and are not on the verge of being released (otherwise we'd
call them "release candidates").

If I've understood that correctly, then I'd suggest "Development" or
"Sandbox". To me, at least, the term "Unmaintained" suggests something
that was once maintained but is no longer. For instance, Mumit's egcs
releases are unmaintained.