From: Danny S. <dan...@cl...> - 2003-07-01 20:58:27
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Earnie Boyd" <ear...@ya...> To: <min...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 14:23 Subject: Re: [MinGW-dvlpr] MS Fundamental Types - patch to _mingw.h > I modified this patch to use macro definitions and have committed it to > CVS. I also added the same definitions to the w32api basetyps.h file. > > Earnie. > > Earnie Boyd wrote: > > Any heartache for this patch? Yup, still.is. I will submit bug report about 'small' and 'hyper' in _mingw.h. __small and __hyper would be okay, but why should mingw break existing code just to be conformant with a stupid MS 'feature'? You already found one breakage in tgamma.c. There are probably a lot more in the rest of cephes package. There _is_ at least one more breakage in a project of mine that uses small as a function name. Danny Danny Danny |