Re: [MinGW-dvlpr] Are we ready for 3.3?

[Earnie B. <ear...@ya...>]

Danny Smith wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Earnie Boyd" <ear...@ya...>
> To: <min...@li...>
> Sent: Friday, 6 June 2003 00:33
> Subject: Re: [MinGW-dvlpr] Are we ready for 3.3?
> 
> 
> 
>>I think we can suffice a Snapshot release.  That's Snapshot with a
>>capital S.  The release name should just be GCC, all capitals.  I'm
>>still wanting to get a consoldiated MinGW updated package out soon.
>>I've just had too many pots on the stove to control it all.
> 
> 
> oh  Earnie.  3.3 is not just an upper-case S snapshot.  It is a a
> milestone,. For the first time in history  we  can release a free
> compiler package  with C, C++, ObjC. Fortran, Ada, Java  -- that
> WORKS -- for windows.   John Donne is reciting poetry in my head.  van

Ok.  I know that you typically like to make at least a release candidate 
first.   Are you suggesting that 3.3 is stable enough for a full release?

Earnie.