RE: [Mingw-users] New missing defines

[Chris H. <pop...@so...>]

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: min...@li...
[mailto:min...@li...]På vegne af Emanuele
Aliberti
Sendt: 14. marts 2001 20:05
Til: min...@li...
Emne: RE: [Mingw-users] New missing defines


>I suspect that if one had access to ntdll sources one would  see  something
>like:
>
>RtlMoveMemory(RtlMoveMemory (VOID* Destination,   CONST VOID* Source,
>SIZE_T
>Length )
>{return memove( Destination, Source, Length)};
>
>and similarly for othe Rtl*Memory functions;
>
>(memmove and friends are in ntdll.dll as well as the C runtime lib)

Those memory functions ARE simular to the C ones in MSVCRT. But when
programming some Windows functions and collecting them in a DLL, I think
about the dependencies. And I don't like using memset as the only MSVCRT
function, when I can use the functions in the Windows kernel and get rid of
the C runtime library.

Otherwise I don't care if I use RtlFillMemory or memset.

Regards
Chris Hansen