|
From: Paul G. <pga...@te...> - 2001-01-10 19:54:49
|
On 10 Jan 2001, at 21:34, the Illustrious Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Paul Garceau writes: > > Far better to rebuild all of your .dlls with either one or the > > other toolset. Trying to build something that uses both > during > runtime is, imho, an invitation to disaster. > > Umm, for C++ code of course as the name mangling and ABI is > different. > But surely, for C code, gcc with -fnative-struct > and using the msvcrt.dll C runtime, and MSVC (cl -MD) > produce totally compatible code? My experience is that an > executable built with gcc can use DLLs built with MSVC, and > vice versa, without problems. Correct! However, the poster was specifically asking about msvc++ as I recall: > -- DapDesign <co...@da...> wrote: > Well, that was the > question. > > A little more explained: > > I want to make a DLL > using Microsoft VStudio 6.0 (using C++).... > This DLL has classes... > and functions that are needed by another DLL, > which I would > like to make using MinGW (please don't ask me why). > Of course, my personal opinion is clearly biased ;-) since I've been using gcc/g++ since before Colin Peters put together his first minimalist gnu-win32 app and subsequently made it available on the net... Peace, Paul G. > > --tml > > > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-users mailing list > Min...@li... > > You may change your MinGW Account Options at: > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/mingw-users > Nothing real can be threatened. Nothing unreal exists. |