From: Earnie B. <ear...@ya...> - 2001-01-06 23:54:03
|
Mo DeJong wrote: > > I am wondering if the "msvc" bit is really the > most clear name we could be using here. It seems > like it might be more clear if "msvcrt" was > used instead. I think "msvc" could be confusing > since someone might think that stood for > the MS VC++ compiler. Why don't we use IDs > like this? > > i386-pc-mingw32-msvcrt-gcc > i386-pc-mingw32-crt-gcc > > That might better fit the GNU model of: > > $machine-$system-$release-$version > > What do you think? > CRTDLL is dead and not going to be supported. If it needs to get changed to fit the model, and since the runtime actually has a version associated with it something like i386-pc-mingw-32-0.4 might make more since. Cheers, Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com |