From: <dan...@ya...> - 2001-12-05 09:45:23
|
--- Thomas Pfaff <tp...@gm...> wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Danny Smith wrote: > > > --- Thomas Pfaff <tp...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Danny Smith wrote: > > > > > I just downloaded gcc-snapshot 20011126 (i can not access the CVS > repositorie due to a firewall that blocks CVS). Maybe you can generate a > diff with your changes as i do not expect to get mingw support out of the > box (correct me if i am wrong and the snapshot is up to date). > > Sorry about the delay. Attached is diff of my sandbox against CVS. Looking at it I don't think any of the C code diffs are necessary for successful build of working compiler. Some of the makefile.in changes may be (depending on how clever your version of make is and whether or not you want to mimic current mingw tree structure on install). You may need to regenerate configure from configure.in. Here is my configure #!/bin/sh ../gcc/configure --with-gcc-version-trigger=/develop/gcc/gcc/gcc/version.c --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --host=mingw32 --target=mingw32 --prefix=/mingw --enable-sjlj-exceptions --enable-threads --disable-nls --enable-languages=ada,f77,c++ --disable-win32-registry --enable-shared Take out the ada unless you have a working gnat and gnatbind. I do not think that the patch for gthr-win32 is > really neccessary but it would make it complete and i will submit the > patch to gcc when you release the new mingw runtime. > The patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-11/msg01455.html has been sitting unreviewed on gcc-patches since 22 Nov. Probably time for a ping. > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-dvlpr mailing list > Min...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-dvlpr http://shopping.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Shopping - Get organised for Christmas early this year! |