Re: Re[2]: [Mingw-users] missing ISO C89/C99 functions in runtime

[Earnie B. <ear...@ya...>]

--- Paul Sokolovsky <pa...@is...> wrote:
>     My HO if it's separate library (not just proxy), it is worth a
> better name. What about libc.a ? ;-)
> 

Too confusing.  It wouldn't be complete. MSVCRT is the libc.  These are newly
added additions to the standard so libnewname.a is definitive.

>     Related question - should we add -liberty as the implicitly
> linkable, it contains getopt which should be in libc.
> 

Debatable, but I'll agree that -liberty should be added to the specs as a
standard library to link with.

Cheers,

=====
Earnie Boyd
mailto:ear...@ya...

---         <http://earniesystems.safeshopper.com>         ---
--- Cygwin: POSIX on Windows <http://gw32.freeyellow.com/> ---
---   Minimalist GNU for Windows <http://www.mingw.org/>   ---

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/