Re: Re[2]: [Mingw-users] Final Q on libjpeg dll build

[Soren A. <so...@wo...>]

On 27 Nov 2000, an entity purporting to be Paul Sokolovsky [Paul Sokolovsky 
<pa...@is...>] wrote [regarding Re[2]: [Mingw-users] Final Q on 
libjpeg dll build]  

 
 SA>
> As for your patch: it's trivial. It hardly needs to be applied as a
> patch. I think my previous messages adaquately documented what I did
> and showed that I had used the substance of your patch.
> 
>     With one difference: my way (patch is a part of it) leads to
> correctly working result (for me, of course).

I want to offer clarification because I think my use of the term "trivial" 
might have been misconstrued. The changes to the source that the patch 
represents are localized to one section only of one file, and easily 
applied, therefore, by the otherwise much-to-be-avoided "manual copy-and-
paste" method. That's all I meant. I have spent so many hours scrutinizing 
that source code that such a change was "trivial" for me to accomplish 
without using `patch'.

  Thanks Paul!
      soren andersen