Re: Re[2]: [Mingw-users] -fnative-struct

[Earnie B. <ear...@ya...>]

--- Paul Sokolovsky <pa...@is...> wrote:
> 
>     Nonetheless, GTK+ is important piece of software, and my attitudes
> lean towards listening what its maintainers want ;-) We'll have
> question of putting -fnative-struct in spec voted - if it's possible
> to use -fnative-struct to have msvc compatibity, it will be quite
> possible to use -fno-native-struct to get cygwin compatibity.
> 

"Cygwin compatibility" isn't an issue.  Cygwin would simply build it's own
version.  Cygwin will most likely not be able to use a MinGW built library
anyway unless perhaps it's a static library and then it should be able to use
it anyway.

Can someone on this list provide a simple test case please?

Cheers,

=====
Earnie Boyd
mailto:ear...@ya...

---         <http://earniesystems.safeshopper.com>         ---
--- Cygwin: POSIX on Windows <http://gw32.freeyellow.com/> ---
---   Minimalist GNU for Windows <http://www.mingw.org/>   ---

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one Place.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/