[Mingw-notify] [ mingw-Bugs-414798 ] __stdcall for inline method definition

[<no...@so...>]

Bugs item #414798, was updated on 2001-04-08 21:05
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=414798&group_id=2435

Category: gcc
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: TAMURA Kent (tkent)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: __stdcall for inline method definition

Initial Comment:
Environment:
  gcc-2.95.2-3
  Windows 2000

__stdcall is ignored if it is attached to inline
definition of a method.  For example:

------------------------------------------------
int bar();

class FooClass {
    public:
    virtual int __stdcall QueryInterfaceI(const void*, 
void**) {
        return bar();
    }
    virtual int __stdcall QueryInterface(const void*, 
void**);
};

int FooClass::QueryInterface(const void*, void**) {
    return bar();
}
-------------------------------------------------

I compiled this source with "gcc.exe -O2 -S 
inline.cpp".
Compiled code for FooClass::QueryInterfaceI() was:

-------------------------------------
_QueryInterfaceI__8FooClassPCvPPv:
	pushl %ebp
	movl %esp,%ebp
	subl $8,%esp
	call _bar__Fv
	leave
	ret
-------------------------------------
The "ret" at the last line must be "ret $12"
because QueryInterfaceI() is __stdcall.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: TAMURA Kent (tkent)
Date: 2001-04-09 19:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=163353

Oops, "gcc didn't print nothing" -> "gcc printed nothing"


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: TAMURA Kent (tkent)
Date: 2001-04-09 19:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=163353

I built a FSF gcc-2.95.3 with Bob Wilson's patch (without
mingw patches) and compiled the code above.  But the gcc
still generated a wrong code.  I inserted printf() at
patched blocks in the cp/decl.c.  gcc didn't print nothing.

Do I need other patches?

-- 
TAMURA Kent

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Danny Smith (dannysmith)
Date: 2001-04-09 05:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=11494

Compiles correctly with gcc-2.95.3 with Bob Wilson's patch. 
Refer #414799

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=414798&group_id=2435