From: Mumit K. <khan@NanoTech.Wisc.EDU> - 2001-06-30 18:35:23
|
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Danny Smith wrote: > > Is this (or similar) the patch, in libbfd.c, I saw it but did't put it > in because I could't see any documentation for it. Sorry. What's the > best way to get something like this into source tree? Similar, but slightly different approach. Mine also checked for Win9x host, so we don't incur the performance penalty on other OSs. I also don't understand a few things done in this patch (who supplied this patch by the way?), such as cur_pos < 0x10000000, etc. I know I have my old stuff on CDs, so I'll see if I can dig it out. Mumit |