Re: [Mingw-users] strtok_r() not implemented

[Anton S. <ant...@gm...>]

Keith Marshall:

>strtok_r()  is  a POSIX.1 function, not ISO-C; thus
>providing it goes beyond the MinGW remit of provid-
>ing "extensions to support ISO-C99".

Understood.

>>I have come up with more consistent version:
>>[...]
>
>You  are, of course, free to adopt this in your own
>applications, but, since it complies with no recog-
>nized standard

That is what have done.

>>The code fragment is broken because grofg ...
>
>What is grofg?  Do you, perhaps, mean groff?

groff, yes.

-- 
Please, do not forward replies to the list to my e-mail.