Re: [Mingw-users] Good GUI debugger for MinGW?

[ralph e. <ral...@gm...>]

GPL as far as i know allows a dev upto 3 years to get a patchset out 
section 3b i believe but lets not split hairs
over this, im more than happy to share my work. Ill even give a small 
tutorial to allow users to build itcl/itk3.4
with MinGW64 with no patching (it works but damn its an ugly way of 
doing it). Basically get Msys2 cd to itcl source dir open bash and make 
sure MSYSTEM=MINGW32 configure change to the MinGW64 compiler and cd 
back into the source dir now make and make install. It works but as you 
can see its not a pretty way of doing things so im working on tcl.m4 so 
that i can regenerate a working configure for MinGW64.

Not sure the patch will work with standard mingw but i might be wrong,
ill upload it to the same folder on sourceforge.

You also need to run sed on /gcc-source/gcc/config/i386/mingw32.h and a 
few other things, so ill upload my build scripts as well.

Here you go 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cbadvanced/files/Tools/gcc-4.9.2-buildsystem.7z/download

Den 06-04-2015 kl. 12:51 skrev Keith Marshall:
> On 06/04/15 10:30, ralph engels wrote:
>> If you had read the message
> I did.
>
>> i pointed out that the patchset for building  the sources are not
>> done yet (specifically the ones reguarding building the itcl/itk 3.3
>> sources with mingw64)
> So, you go ahead and post binaries, before you are able to deliver
> matching source?  Technically, that's a GPL infringement.
>
>> i can provide the insight/gdb sources if you want a look,
> Please post them alongside your binaries.  (I am more interested in
> those relating to mingw32, and compatible with MinGW.org distribution;
> they should be in a form which will allow me to reproduce your build).
>
>> or simply get them from the msys2 project.
> No.  In directing me to another project, which you don't control, you
> are yet again infringing GPL; *you* are required to furnish source for
> the binaries you distribute, preferably using a similar distribution
> medium, via a conduit which *you* control.
>
> Please don't misunderstand me; I don't want to see your project shut
> down, but you really do need to take better care to comply with the
> relevant licences ... GPL requires you to be in a position to supply
> source on demand, such that any other user can reproduce your builds,
> and it does not permit you to abrogate responsibility for such supply by
> delegation to a third party.
>