Re: [Mingw-users] Why several versions of the same utility?

[LRN <lr...@gm...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 19.08.2012 10:29, Dipanjan Das wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> 
> I'm replying your mail inline.
> 
> On 19 August 2012 10:57, JonY <jo...@us...> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> If you have to mess with makefiles in your IDEs, you're doing it
>> wrong. Since you're already using MinGW with MSYS and messing
>> with makefiles, I suggest dropping the IDE, it gets in the way,
>> use something sane like vi or notepad++.
> 
> 
> No, I am not at all touching my IDE generated makefiles. Eclipse
> is quite flexible in allowing to change every component, e.g.
> assembler, compiler, linker, builder of the selected tool chain.
> That is what I am playing with.
It would be a good idea to ask Eclipse users about it too. There's a
good chance that you're not the first person to use MinGW with
Eclipse, and if you find other ones, they'll be in a better position
to point all the pitfalls, best practices etc. They'll tell you if
you're doing it wrong.

Me, i stopped using IDEs years ago.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQMIzwAAoJEOs4Jb6SI2CwHuEIALv/+nZnK2fAeb+yu+nP6LqP
UUaJ18u3WDnJcL0+03srkzx4n/o6Yco9SLLb/Cuwql4n9ZpX7ATFUloxAROvzPwE
FhTgxjkTVcDAJBL3RckVzViFtzvnFZupadoCdyUBOoHDwnSsk8+G8uF41li8dDJo
aczdjZiANVVh/tiU/I3d/7UBh0Z53rWthHjL5LI3ogUQCXctn+pjxQ4nYiQqCMS1
7Ekb7z2vpZT+vBLNaR43R9kFaxIFJqNf0DYViN/eAtSlOxRCKkZIOKfNxSiKhCCP
w4VgqT6INMbyRcmaWI6tlAuQPu6YvdtFIHa24h4vZe0tTNTHiUkzQrB9R9BffO0=
=kMnP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----