From: Charles W. <cwi...@us...> - 2011-11-01 21:03:17
|
On 11/1/2011 4:15 PM, Earnie wrote: > Keith Marshall wrote: > Elided lots of detail ... >> >> Comments? >> > > When looking at FRS/mingw/files IMO at most we should see [elided lots of detail] Earnie, you're talking about "how the FRS storage is structured". Keith is talking about "How the mingw-git GUI will present categories" -- which, in my opinion, are *two completely separate issues*. The answers to those two questions may contains some superficial similarities, such as "MinGW should have a 'Contributed' subdir" AND "MinGW should have a 'Contributed' affiliate group" -- but that's immaterial here. The Affiliate Groups can be as wild and woolly as we want them to, because there is an important difference between AG's and the FRS: a single package can simultaneously be part of multiple AG's (conceptually speaking; dunno if mingw-get groks that or not) -- but I *really* don't want to have to maintain sym/hardlinks on the frs to allow packages to live in two different places. -- Chuck |