From: Earnie <ea...@us...> - 2011-06-05 00:50:00
|
Teemu Nätkinniemi wrote: > On 3.6.2011 23:05, Earnie wrote: >> Teemu Nätkinniemi wrote: >>> On 3.6.2011 14:16, Earnie wrote: >>>> Keith Marshall wrote: >>>>> On 3 June 2011 10:51, Fabian Greffrath wrote: >>>>>> Am 01.06.2011 13:57, schrieb Earnie: >>>>>>> What I did to bootstrap the MSYS idea was to rename cygwin1.dll to the >>>>>>> msys-1.0.dll and modify the initial binaries with the new dll name. >>>>>>> Then I started hacking on cygwin configure and source to produce the >>>>>>> first MSYS. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there something like a diff between cygwin-1.2 and msys-1.0 so one >>>>>> can actually see what had to get changed? >>>>> >>>>> The CVS history, perhaps? The initial import should be close, if not >>>>> identical, to the original cygwin-1.3 (not1.2, IIRC) source. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, the initial CVS head version should match exactly the cygwin-1.3 >>>> source release. So you should be able to use cvs diff to find the >>>> differences. >>> >>> Here's the Cygwin 1.3.3 sources: >>> >>> http://www.mediafire.com/?g662p37d78pel4y >>> >> >> Is that the source or the binary distribution? The sources had a -src >> in the tar file name, IIRC. >> > > I pulled it from Cygwin CVS and the changelog is exactly the same as in > Msys. > > Here's a diff between the cygwin folders. > > http://www.mediafire.com/?14kpzmrw1vv485n > Please find a different service to upload to. This one is annoying with it's pop-up adverts and I'll refuse to click the links anymore. The new SF beta for your personal user account will allow you to create a file sharing ability maybe you can use it. See your sf.net/u/<user>/admin page, where <user> is your SF user name. Does applying this patch in reverse of the 1.1.1.1 CVS entry cause a difference then when compared to Cygwin 1.3.3? -- Earnie -- http://www.for-my-kids.com |