Re: [Mingw-users] strangeness with sscanf and the '%hc' format

[Vincent T. <vt...@un...>]

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Keith Marshall wrote:

> On Tuesday 29 June 2010 15:14:56 Vincent Torri wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Earnie wrote:
>>> Vincent Torri wrote:
>>>> Your comments are not quite precise, you even don't answer to my
>>>> question.
>>>
>>> Greg's comments were precise to your post.
>>
>> no. Indeed:
>>
>> "That page says "The h, l, and L prefixes are Microsoft extensions
>> when used with data of type char.""
>>
>> So what ?
>
> Vincent,
>
> Please moderate your tone before I take steps to do so for you.
>
>> I have given you that web page. I've read it.
>
> But not particularly diligently, it would seem.
>
>> I have read
>> the comment, and more importantly, i have read what is in the
>> table, that is how i should use the modifier.
>
> And you still think it refers to signed vs. unsigned behaviour?
> Nowhere on that page do I see the slightest hint that it might serve
> that purpose.  It doesn't.  It refers exclusively to the *size* of
> the type associated with the pointer you pass as scanf argument.
>
>> Is Greg's comment useful ? no.
>
> Please bear in mind that neither Greg, nor anyone else, is obliged to
> answer you at all; you should be thankful that he took the trouble to
> do so.  If this is the kind of abuse we can expect from you, when you
> don't get an entirely satisfactory (to you) answer, then don't be at
> all surprised when we simply ignore you altogether.

Indeed, noone is obliged to answer, as i'm not obliged to use MinGW. I'm 
fed up with you guys, with the way you treat people. You don't accept 
people to complain, but you feel free to not care about your users.

You've just lost a user

goodbye

Vincent Torri