From: Isidor Z. <mi...@qu...> - 2010-06-18 17:50:17
|
> > > True, people are always good at working around tool > > > deficiencies. However, it doesn't necessarily mean that not having > > > to do so is a disadvantage. > > > > It's a lot of effort to accurately migrate a VCS while preserving > > history > > A lot of effort, consisting of one line of code starting with "git > cvsimport..." > ..and because I prefer to act and contribute rather than to hypothesize about how things could be, I put up a git mirror of the CVS sources, so the mystics have something to get a warm and fuzzy feeling about, the nostalgics have something to ignore, and the gimmick lovers have something to try getting productive with: [1]. Clone away... > > > > It comes down to available manpower and time. The core devs are tapped > > out; look how long it's taking to get mingw-get out the door -- and even > > there, we have a mega-thread from non-core-devs about writing python > > scripts to install msys/mingw "in the interim until mingw-get is ready" > > -- INSTEAD OF ACTUALLY HELPING TO GET MINGW-GET READY. Insanity. > > > However, I do wonder to what extent it can be considered insanity when people try to put up mingw-get alternatives when the mingw homepage explicitly states "the maintainer is not yet accepting patches" ([2]). I think people interested in a working mingw-get will strive to simply get things working, be it through patching what doesn't work well for them. Best regards, Isidor [1] http://gitorious.org/mingw-unofficial [2] http://www.mingw.org/wiki/Official_CVS_Repository |