From: Mauricio G. <mgp...@gm...> - 2010-06-16 17:34:55
|
I agree and I did not mean to put any pressure on Earnie. Sorry if I gave that impression. And according to Charles Wilson message I was wrong anyway about the absence of encryption code. Best regards. Mau. 2010/6/16 KHMan <kei...@gm...>: > > I agree the wording of the text below really casts a wide net. > Then again, I know nothing about the status of the US gov's > current position on this so I can't judge anything. > > It would not be fair to expect Earnie et al. to bear such risk. > Any chance that a group like EFF will want to clarify this? I > guess I should be checking some of the general SourceForge docs > now, there's a chance others are making the same noise... > >> >> # Export Controls: >> >> This project does NOT incorporate, access, call upon, or otherwise use >> encryption of any kind, including, but not limited to, open source >> algorithms and/or calls to encryption in the operating system or >> underlying platform. >> >> This project DOES incorporate, access, call upon or otherwise use >> encryption. Posting of open source encryption is controlled under U.S. >> Export Control Classification Number "ECCN" 5D002 and must be >> simultaneously reported by email to the U.S. government. You are >> responsible for submitting this email report to the U.S. government in >> accordance with procedures described in: >> http://www.bis.doc.gov/encryption/PubAvailEncSourceCodeNotify.html and >> Section 740.13(e) of the Export Administration Regulations ("EAR") 15 >> C.F.R. Parts 730-772. >> >> |