From: Keith M. <kei...@us...> - 2008-09-02 20:05:07
|
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 14:38:24 techtonik wrote: > How about > > runtime32-3.15-dev.tar.gz > runtime64-3.15-dev.tar.gz Neither of these can be deterministically parsed, to uniquely and separately identify the package name, and the target system type. We are now at a time in the project development cycle, where we need to recognize two equally important target systems, (even if one of those is currently being supported by a renegade project fork), and IMO, it is important that our package naming schema reflects this. > As for specific "runtime" case - if it is intended to be used by > other projects as dependency then it should be explicitly named > with mingw* to keep it clear which runtime it is. In this respect > mingwrt32-3.15-dev.tar.gz seems to be more optimal variant. Again, no it doesn't, for the same reason. Regards, Keith. |