|
From: Laia M. <man...@gm...> - 2007-06-22 21:53:19
|
Thank you Danny for sharing your code, and all the others for sharing your ideas and helping me out with this. Such a lively forum is the best argument to use MinGW. I thought I would post a wrap-up message for future reference with some information about how I finally addressed the issue. I ended up choosing the solution suggested by Ralf---using the tsearch module in gnulib (I had to change tsearch.c and search.h a little, though, to get things working). The program now compiles and runs in Windows. This solution, however, required using autoconf and automake, with which I was not really familiar. I was willing to (auto)make the extra effort to learn that stuff, but I am not sure whether other people with the same problem will do the same, so I still think that providing these functions in MinGW would be helpful (if Danny's code is added to libmingwex, though, tdestroy would be nice to have, too). As I already mentioned, a minor additional annoyance during the process is that there is already a search.h in MinGW, which does not correspond with those in gnulib or glibc. If anyone things that I can be helpful in adding these functions to MinGW, please do not hesitate to ask (although, remember, I am no real programmer :) Laia |