|
From: Danny S. <dan...@cl...> - 2007-06-15 19:19:24
|
> But why uglify the names? Because some people want ANSI standard. Just because Microsnot do it, > doesn't mean we > have to follow suit. Better IMO to keep the same names as > are used in > glibc; uglification serves only to unnecessarily increase the porting > burden, It avoid polluting the namespace with non-standard symbols in deference to an irrelevant Microsnot convention, (unless > there is a naming conflict to resolve). Actually, MS is doing the right thing here. Danny > > Regards, > Keith. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-users mailing list > Min...@li... > > You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users > |