RE: [Mingw-users] Missing WTS defines

[Wells, R. K. <ROG...@sa...>]

I understand and support that.

Roger Wells, P.E.
SAIC
221 Third St
Newport, RI 02840
401-847-4210 (voice)
401-849-1585 (fax)
rog...@sa...

-----Original Message-----
From: min...@li...
[mailto:min...@li...] On Behalf Of Keith MARSHALL
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 9:24 AM
To: min...@li...
Subject: RE: [Mingw-users] Missing WTS defines

Roger K. Wells wrote:
> Anyone can certainly get to that list of definitions
> without ever having installed the SDK however.

Yes, and if they have been legitimately published, then we
can use them.

The two MSDN links, cited previously, are a legitimate source
for *some* of them.  Apparently, at least one is missing, so
we must exercise caution in what we implement;  we will *not*
accept patches based on information from any source for which
legitimacy cannot be established.

Regards,
Keith.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
MinGW-users mailing list
Min...@li...

You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users