|
From: Earnie B. <ea...@pr...> - 2005-10-11 13:14:49
|
Quoting Keith MARSHALL <kei...@to...>: > > Earnie Boyd wrote: >> As far as I remember, the document you signed to give Copyright to >> FSF leaves you with Copyright as well. You are free to redistribute >> with a different license as Copyright owner if you desire. The >> redistributed license would then be a fork of the FSF version. > > I'll need to check that. If this is indeed the case, then I *could* > offer them as a public domain add-on option for MinGW users. (I'd > need to think about that; I wouldn't be generally happy at the > possibility of my code potentially lining someone else's pocket). > But even if I were to make it available in this manner, it would > probably still be best to view it as an optional add on feature, > rather than integrating it as a MinGW default. > It doesn't have to be PD we could live with a BSD license or any other license that doesn't require the user of the code to change his license based on the license of the source being used. E.G. BSD will permit you to retain the Copyright but doesn't force me to use BSD. BTW, GPL doesn't prevent someone from lining their pockets with your work. FSF in fact encourages others to take the code and make a living at supporting the code for others. Earnie |