Re: [Mingw-users] Pointer initialisation

[Snaury <sn...@gm...>]

On 6/16/05, Foster, Gareth <gar...@si...> wrote:
> > Now, when I add obvious void to somemethod, both gcc (3.4.2
> > mingw-special) and cl (version 13.10.3052) are compiling this code
> > with no problems. Maybe the snippet you provided is incomplete?
> You were exactly right to add the return, as I explained in a reply to
> another post on this, I only inteded the code as a quick example.
>
> That aside, it appears that code compiles fine under g++ and newer
> incarnations of vc ++ from what you have said? Can I safely assume that t=
his
> is then legal c++ and put it down to yet another vc++ quirk do you think?

Hmm. I'm not sure. You can try something like this:

[...]
typedef something* psomething;

class example {
public:
  psomething m_p_something;

  void somemethod() {
    psomething p_something(m_p_something);
  }
};
[...]

And see if vc++ compiles that...