|
From: Danny S. <dan...@cl...> - 2005-01-29 05:42:46
|
Greg Chicares wrote: > On 2005-01-27 03:29 AM, Danny Smith wrote: > >> Greg Chicares wrote: >> > > I will. First, though, let's try to solve the M_LN2 problem. > I'd hate to hardcode a constant value in expm1() now, when what > we really want is to use that macro, but with a value that's > not overstated. On second thought, hardcoded values of the constants may be the way to go, particulary if we put inline versions of the functions in math.h. The M_* defines are !__STRICT_ANSI__, so we can't be sure that they will be visible (eg, if --std=c99). Danny. |