Re: [Mingw-users] Re: Does current MinGW conflict with Symantec?

[Earnie B. <ea...@us...>]

John,

Danny just announced a Candidate for binutils that should contain the fix
mentioned in your reference post.  Candidates are not considered for MinGW
bundles.  Testing the Candidate will get it moved to Current faster.


<quote who="Seal, John J">
> You were right, Earnie, MinGW-3.2.0rc did not resolve the issue.  I know
> that MinGW is not Cygwin, but this problem was apparently fixed there:
>
> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2004-10/msg00093.html
>
> Would it be possible for that fix to be ported to MinGW?  I don't know if
> MinGW normally tracks Cygwin changes or not.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Subject: MinGW-users digest, Vol 1 #2489 - 7 msgs
>
>> Message: 4
>
>> I doubt that the
>> MinGW-3.2.0 tarball will resolve the issue as it has nothing
>> MSYS related.
>


Earnie

--
http://www.mingw.org
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw
https://sourceforge.net/donate/index.php?user_id=15438