|
From: <cx...@nt...> - 2005-01-13 20:24:55
|
At the moment, I am not sure, as I am not the author of package and I hav= e=20 no deeper knowledge of it beyound the fact it works well for purpose I ne= ed=20 it (that is, reducing link time of my ussual mingw projects from minutes = to=20 seconds). I am afraid author is not subscribed to this mailing list, if you want to= =20 contact him, try uppmain mailing list instead. Also, I think he is open t= o=20 improvements. I will try to bring his attention here. Anyway, it is drop-in replacement. All you need to test it is backup=20 (rename) your original ld.exe/ar.exe, unpack uldar and put new ld.exe and= =20 ar.exe to bin. Would you wish to play with sources, they are part of regular U++ release= s. Mirek ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Aaron W. LaFramboise" <aar...@aa...> To: <min...@li...> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 7:32 PM Subject: Re: ontopic advertisement... Was Re: [Mingw-users] Did the linke= r=20 get faster? [Was: supplement to ...undefined reference to=20 '_imp__FT_ListDevices@12'] Mirek F=EDdler wrote: > uldar > It is rewritten from scratch and significantly faster (order of=20 > magnitude - > of course, depends on what you link...). Since this information does not appear to be obviously accessable on the main page, can you briefly summarize the main features of this linker from a standpoint useful for people presently using GNU binutils ld? How does its PECOFF support compare to binutils'? Does it support any of the extended features binutils supports, such as -wrap? Aaron W. LaFramboise ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ MinGW-users mailing list Min...@li... You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users |