From: Michael G. <mg...@te...> - 2004-07-15 10:22:55
|
> > If there are voices not wanting this to become the default behavior > > (e.g. because that would break legacy code; not sure wether it would > > be possible to have some dirty hacks make use of it) > > then there should be a switch. >=20 > If the problem is just that names aren't being mangled correctly, is > there any reason we can't just mangle names both ways for a (hopefully > short) transitional period (one minor release iteration)? I think this particular problem should get a new subject though I have no clever idea that is less than 60 chars... Danny's testprogram does not link (at least here) and if I understood his proposal correctly should not compile without warnings/errors. Best, Michael =2D-=20 Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ Michael Gerdau email: mg...@te... GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver |