|
From: MARSHALL K. <Kei...@to...> - 2004-05-19 12:47:13
|
> ... first name returned was ".", wich [sic] doesn't mean much > to Windows-kids, but reminds us the good'ol DOS days, where every "dir" > command started by those famous "one-dot" and "two-dots" files... > (still there, as one can see it through CMD, but not visible in the Windows > explorer) It's actually a concept which Bill pinched from UNIX, where *every* directory contains a '.' link (to itself), and a '..' link (to its parent); (even the root directory has both, with '..' recursively linked to itself!). On UNIX, these are deemed hidden (from a regular directory listing), by virtue of the initial '.' in the name; (an 'ls -a' listing will reveal them). So, Windows Explorer is perhaps, closer to the original UNIX concept, in concealing them, than DOS was, in showing them. It is a great shame that Bill didn't, at the same time, pinch the UNIX concept of a homogeneous, singly rooted logical file system, instead of persisting with the fragmented architecture he pinched from CPM. Best regards, Keith. |