From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2003-12-10 21:08:47
|
Flame extinguisher is being applied. Stop the bickering now, please. Earnie. Don HO wrote: > Obviously, you did a scientific analysis > > > Don HO > Je bouffe donc je suis > > Find a powerful free (and open source) multi-function editor at > http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/ > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Alvin Thompson <mailto:al...@th...> > *To:* min...@li... > <mailto:min...@li...> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:25 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Mingw-users] Generated Binary is BIGGER than > VC++7generatedbinary !!! > > that's right; when someone exposes your observations as unscientific > and specious, just get snippy. that'll help your case. > > -alvin > > On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 14:15, Don HO wrote: > >> / // >> I think it's a mailing list of MinGW, am I wrong? >> >> >> Don HO >> Je bouffe donc je suis >> >> Find a powerful free (and open source) multi-function editor at >> _http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/_ >> >> / >> >> /----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* _Alvin Thompson_ <mailto:al...@th...> >> *To:* _mi...@li..._ >> <mailto:min...@li...> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2003 5:57 PM >> *Subject:* Re: [Mingw-users] Generated Binary is BIGGER than >> VC++ 7generatedbinary !!! >> >> i stated my problem quite clearly. >> >> -alvin >> >> >> On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 18:48, Don HO wrote: / >> >>> / >>> What's your problem? >>> >>> >>> Don HO >>> Je bouffe donc je suis >>> >>> Find a powerful free (and open source) multi-function editor at >>> _http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/_ >>> >>> / >>> >>> /----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* _Alvin Thompson_ <mailto:al...@th...> >>> *To:* _mi...@li..._ >>> <mailto:min...@li...> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2003 5:00 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: [Mingw-users] Generated Binary is BIGGER >>> than VC++ 7 generatedbinary !!! >>> >>> On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 20:00, Don HO wrote: / >>> >>>> /Yes it is really significant. >>>> 2 essential creterias for a compile : the size of >>>> generated code and its execution speed. >>>> Do you agree? / >>> >>> / >>> then perhaps you should do a more appropriate test? like >>> checking compile size/speed of a program of a more >>> realistic size/scope? saying that some one-line program >>> differs in size by a few k isn't really saying anything. >>> >>> in addition, since your code is so small it's negligible, >>> you may well be testing how efficiently the MinGW >>> libraries are written instead of how efficiently the >>> compiler compiles (at least as far as speed is concerned, >>> if not size as well)... >>> >>> if you're really interested in making an evaluation worth >>> reading and not cluttering my inbox with drivel, you will >>> need to analyze the generated assembly code from both >>> compilers. >>> >>> just a (half-baked) thought, >>> alvin / >> >> ================== >> Alvin Thompson >> >> Navy: 34 >> Army: 6 >> > ================== > Alvin Thompson > > Navy: 34 > Army: 6 > > > -- http://www.mingw.org <http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw> |