From: GF <ts...@cy...> - 2003-02-10 08:41:33
|
> thought I'd chime in... > First, I have always been one who wished to make the list a members only > list. A > members only list, afaik, means that you can not post or receive anything > to the list UNLESS > you are officially subscribed to the list itself. > What that means, overall, is that those who have been posting, who > currently do not > have an official subscription to the list, or have not officially > subscribed to the list, will not be > able to post or receive any posts to the list. > The problem, as it stands now, seems to be that spammers find some sort > of bizarre > satisfaction in posting things to whatever mailing lists they can manage > to access. As a > members only list, the opportunity for spammers to "get their giggles" > from posting stuff to > this list will be massively reduced. > Any spammers who attempt to get a subscription, however, still can. The > value of > making it a members only list is that the admins of the list can > periodically go through and > eliminate any email addresses that may appear, or be known to be, spam > generators. > rgfsAdrianna, for instance, would be able to subscribe, but if that > particular spammer > continued to post, it would be a simple matter for a list admin to simply > delete rgfsAdrianna > from the subscription list and if the spamming continued, could then ban > the email address > from even the possibility of the using the list. > In essence, making the list a members only list puts far more control in > the hands of the > list admins when it comes to who can or can not post to the list itself. > It also, by nature of the > increased levels of control, increases the level of administrative > responsibility for a list > admin. > Personal opinion, then, is this: make it members only. > Paul G. And what if they spoof your email? Spammer usually fake their email! /gf |