AW: [Mingw-users] Mingw GCC 3.1 linux to windows cross compiler

[<de...@lm...>]

Hello,

I am just trying nearly the same thing. Building a mingw cross compiler =
on
Solaris.

When I enter the compiler line from the config ouput by hand ld says:
-luser32 is missing.

I install the missing libs from the mingw distribution and get gcc 3.1
running on solaris
for a simple hello-world program. But I stick when I try to compile a =
more
complicated program.
-> strtoull() is missing (referenced in a c++ lib, not in my program)

Is there already a 3.1 cross compiler for mingw build out there?

Ruediger

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von:	Federico Fernandez [SMTP:fed...@di...]
> Gesendet am:	Montag, 17. Juni 2002 16:42
> An:	Jos=E9 Fonseca
> Cc:	min...@li...
> Betreff:	Re: [Mingw-users] Mingw GCC 3.1 linux to windows cross
> compiler
>=20
> Hi Jos=E9 and all!=20
>=20
> I have already tried what you said.=20
>=20
> I used your xmingw32.mak and SF tgzs for binutils, gcc, w32api and
> mingw-runtime. I updated the versions and make.=20
>=20
> When building binutils I have a problem with stricmp (unresolved =
symbols)
> in pe-dll.c I just changed "stricmp" to strcmp. I think this is a =
minor
> problem. (don't know too much about this). After that everything in
> binutils went ok.=20
>=20
> It's time for gcc. The first problem I found was that stdio.h was not
> found. I thought this was a problem about include directories and =
move
> some files from w32api and mingw-runtime to the correct place.=20
>=20
> Gcc started compiling again and it went far away until reconfiguring =
when
> I got this error:=20
>=20
>=20
> checking whether the C compiler
> (/home/federico/mingw/gcc-3_1-20020516/gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/federico/mingw/gcc-3_1-20020516/gcc/
> -B/home/federico/xmingw32/i386-mingw32msvc/bin/
> -B/home/federico/xmingw32/i386-mingw32msvc/lib/ -isystem
> /home/federico/xmingw32/i386-mingw32msvc/include -s -O2 ) works... no =

> configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler =
cannot
> create executables.=20
>=20
>=20
> At this point I couldn't continue. No matter what I tried.=20
>=20
>=20
> I hope this explanation is useful for you, and therefore for me.=20
>=20
>=20
> Thanks=20