From: Paul G. <pga...@my...> - 2002-02-21 00:28:52
|
what the heck... ----- Original Message ----- From: Ulf Schreiber <ulf...@gm...> Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 3:00 pm Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] MinGW logo > Devin Carless wrote: > > > > > GCC's Linux roots). However, I kinda hope that MinGW never > "standardizes"> > on any one pronunciation or the other. > > > > One of the more important features of the MinGW name is that > it supports > > multiple vocal standards. The source code is portable across a > wide range > > of operating systems and languages. Wetware compilation can produce > > multiple vocal executables from the single source, all mutually > > comprehensible > > by the end user. MinGW executable statements can be optimized > so they do > > not overtax the tongue's system resources ('Ming-W') or for clarity > > ('Min-G-W.') > > > > MinGW also has extensive network support, in that many people > can talk > > about it at once. Pronunciation varies from country to country, but the functionality remains the same. American pronunciation (at least this american) goes like this: Ming (Meen'G) "double u" part in quotes is vocalized. Paul G. |