From: Aleks K. <ale...@ma...> - 2014-05-27 11:49:59
|
>> Which miktex manual (not tex or latex or ... manual) do say something about \expandafter or \noexpand? For instance, TeX by topic, Victor Eijkhout, section 12.3.2 on page 100. In the middle of the page is written that any control sequence preceded by noexpand will not be expanded Aleks Kleyn http://alekskleyn.dyndns-home.com:4080/ http://sites.google.com/site/AleksKleyn/ http://arxiv.org/a/kleyn_a_1 http://AleksKleyn.blogspot.com/ http://KleynAleks.blogspot.com/ Derivative in Banach algebra ∂x2=1⊗ x+x⊗1 ∂x2◦dx=dx x+x dx -----Original Message----- From: Ulrike Fischer [mailto:li...@ni...] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 7:13 AM To: mik...@li... Subject: Re: [MiKTeX] edef mathcal err Am Tue, 27 May 2014 06:46:31 -0400 schrieb Aleks Kleyn: > I know that questions about code should be asked in other forum. > But when code does not work as it is written in manual, then is it the > question about coding or about bug in software? Which miktex manual (not tex or latex or ... manual) do say something about \expandafter or \noexpand? > Why expandafter and noexpand work properly in one place and do not > work in edef? As I said: This is the wrong group. Beside this I would guess that you are using the wrong number of \expandafter. -- Ulrike Fischer http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The best possible search technologies are now affordable for all companies. Download your FREE open source Enterprise Search Engine today! Our experts will assist you in its installation for $59/mo, no commitment. Test it for FREE on our Cloud platform anytime! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=145328191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ MiKTeX-Users mailing list MiK...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miktex-users |